Did
Luther say, “Be a sinner and sin boldly”?
October 2005
-Table
of Contents-
Did Luther exhort Christians to “Sin Boldly”? A brief
look at Catholic criticism against Luther and the doctrine of sola fide
Luther’s understanding of faith, good works, and
salvation
III. The Context of the
“Sin Boldly” Statement
Where does Luther’s Statement “Sin Boldly” come from?
IV. Sin Boldly: A Detailed
Analysis
A look at the context of Luther’s “Sin Boldly” statement
V. The Roman Catholic
Interpretation of Luther’s “Sin Boldly”
Catholic scholars, websites, and laymen interpret Luther
VI. Quotations From Luther
on Faith and Works
Extensive practical quotations from Luther on faith and
works
a. Living Faith, Dead Faith, Works, and the
Law
b. Good Works: Serving Our Neighbor
Endnotes: Bibliographic
material.
*Throughout this paper,
Luther’s words will be in blue.
“…Denifle denied [Luther]
veracity, depicted a lecherous young man ridden by unconquerable concupiscence
of the flesh, and later exhibited a bloated besotted beast given to vile
ragings and obscene vituperation. Luther had been wicked very wicked
indeed—why, his own words about culpa, culpa, mea maxima culpa!" and his
inability to find peace even behind monastery walls convict him! Unable to find
any goodness even with God's grace Luther in final desperation simply
"invented" forgiveness for nothing, i.e., justification through
faith—and then advised "pecca fortiter," sin boldly! Thus he
unleashed all the wicked passions of the Evangelical Reformation.”[2]
Rev. Peter Guilday from the Catholic University of America stated, “…Every Catholic should acquaint himself with the life story of the man whose followers can never explain away the anarchy of that immoral dogma: ‘Be a sinner, and sin boldly; but believe more boldly still’.”[3] Father O’Hare proclaims, “The defenders of Luther do not deny the recommendation he addressed to Melanchthon. To hide its grossness, however, they, in the blasphemy of despair, have edited and interpreted the recommendation so as to give it a turn and a meaning altogether unwarranted and untenable.”[4] The truth is, Luther quite seriously penned the exhortation to “sin boldly”. Contrary to Reverend Guilday, it doesn’t take that much reading of Luther’s writings to acquaint oneself with Luther’s basic theological understanding of faith and works. Nor is it necessary to “spin” the words “sin boldly” to get Luther off the hook as Father O’Hare suggests.
The purpose of this paper is to answer these charges. As a quick background overview, the first part of this paper will examine Luther’s concept of justification by faith alone and its relation to good works. It will be established that Luther held good works to be the result of living faith. Good works were to be carried out by those grateful to God for His mercy, for the benefit of others rather than personal gain (be it temporal or spiritual). This will serve as the theological context by which the comment “sin boldly” will be analyzed.
The second part of this paper will look specifically at Luther’s comment to “sin boldly.” Rather than proving that Luther lived an immoral life and advocated perpetual sin for Protestants, or that he invented justification by faith alone in order to enjoy sin, the words “sin boldly” in context of both the letter they occur in, and Luther’s basic theology prove the exact opposite.
The third section of this paper takes a look at a few Roman Catholic interpretations of Luther’s “sin boldly” comment. Have they understood what Luther meant? Have they fairly treated Luther’s theology and life?
The last section contains extensive quotes from Luther establishing his basic understanding of the relationship between faith and works. Quotes from Luther on what constitutes “bad works” are provided for contrast. The quotes are provided to show that those who quote Luther’s “sin boldly” statement do so at the expense of his entire written corpus. Luther’s Godly attitude towards faith, works, salvation and his exhortations against sin are blatantly and explicitly throughout his writings, in some case the subject of entire treatises. To ignore the obvious while scrutinizing the obscure proves sadly that truth in research is not the goal of many who approach Luther from a non-Protestant perspective.
Does justification by faith alone provide a license
for sin? Luther was acutely aware of this allegation. In a sermon, he
summarized the charge leveled against him: “Where the Gospel begins to loose the conscience of its own
works, it seems to forbid good works and the keeping of the law. It is the
common speech of all the teachers of the law, and of the scribes and doctors,
to say: If all our works amount to nothing and if the works done under the law
are evil, we will never do good. You forbid good works and throw away God's
law; you heretic, you…wish to make bad people free.”[5]
Luther
understood that even our best efforts were tainted with sin. If God demands
perfection in order for one to be justified before Him, no one would ever be
justified. For
Luther, justification was actually totally of works, but those works
were perfect and performed by the perfect savior, Jesus Christ. These works are
acquired by faith, imputed to the sinner.
Luther says, “[I]f you desire to believe rightly and to possess Christ truly,
then you must reject all works that you intend to place before and in the way
of God. They are only stumbling blocks, leading you away from Christ and from
God. Before God no works are acceptable but Christ's own works. Let these plead
for you before God, and do no other work before him than to believe that Christ
is doing his works for you and is placing them before God in your behalf.”[6]
For Luther grace, faith,
and the work of Christ are essential ingredients that justify, and that
justification is a gift as well as the very faith involved. As Paul says in
Ephesians 2:8-9, “For by grace have ye been saved through faith; and that not
of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not of works, that no man should glory.”
But isn’t the Roman Catholic charge against Luther valid? If God judges a man
by Christ’s perfect works, why should any Christian ever care about leading a
righteous life? If grace, faith, and justification are God’s gifts, what is
left for us to do? Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.
Paul
answers for Luther in Ephesians 2:10, “For we are His workmanship, created in
Christ Jesus for good works, which God afore prepared that we should
walk in them.” Faith performs good
works, not to keep one justified, but out of heartfelt gratitude to God
graciousness. Salvation is unto good works. Note what this means: good
works are not unto eventual salvation. We are saved in order to
perform good works, not by performing them.
“Faith,” wrote Luther, “is a living, restless thing. It cannot be inoperative. We are not saved by works; but if there be no works, there must be something amiss with faith.”[7] Luther scholar Paul Althaus notes: “[Luther] also agrees with James that if no works follow it is certain that true faith in Christ does not live in the heart but a dead, imagined, and self-fabricated faith."[8] The book of James describes a real true faith in Christ: a real saving faith is a living faith. If no works are found in a person, that faith is a dead faith (c.f. James 2:17). James then describes a dead faith: the faith of a demon. A demon has faith that God exists, that Christ rose from the dead- I would dare say a demon knows theology better than you or I. But is the faith of this demon a saving faith? Absolutely not.[9] Luther says, “Accordingly, if good works do not follow, it is certain that this faith in Christ does not dwell in our heart, but dead faith…”[10]
But what are good works then? Luther abhorred the pseudo-works perpetuated by “devout”
Roman Catholics. Pilgrimages, idolatry, monkery, self-denials, etc., which were
considered “good works” one does for oneself on the road to eventual salvation.
These works take one down a completely opposite road. Luther said of these
alleged works:
“How they mislead people with their good
works! They call good works what God has not commanded, as pilgrimages, fasting,
building and decorating their churches in honor of the saints, saying mass,
paying for vigils, praying with rosaries, much prattling and bawling in
churches, turning nun, monk, priest, using special food, raiment or
dwelling,-who can enumerate all the horrible abominations and deceptions? This
is the pope's government and holiness.”[11]
Luther
defines good works as those “works that flow
from faith and from the joy of heart that has come to us because we have
forgiveness of sins through Christ.”[12] Only what God commands is a good work: “Everybody should consider precious and glorious whatever God
commands, even though it were no more than picking a wisp of straw from the
ground.”[13] Works aren’t done because we want salvation and fear
damnation. Luther says, “…[W]e are not to do them
merely because we fear death or hell, or because we love heaven, but because
our spirit goes out freely in love of, and delight in, righteousness.”[14] Luther plainly teaches that saving faith is a living
faith.
Luther
taught a life under the cross, which is a life of discipleship of
following after Christ. Our crosses though, do not save. They serve the
neighbor. We are called to be neighbor to those around us. Luther says,
“We receive
Christ not only as a gift by faith, but also as an example of love toward our
neighbor, whom we are to serve as Christ serves us. Faith brings and gives
Christ to you with all his possessions. Love gives you to your neighbor with
all your possessions. These two things constitute a true and complete Christian
life; then follow suffering and persecution for such faith and love, and out of
these grows hope and patience.”[15]
It is with this theological background in mind that we come to Luther’s “sin boldly” statement. Based on this background, the words do indeed appear to be out of place. Why would Luther tell someone to “sin boldly” if he believed in a living faith showing its vitality by its works? How could Luther say something so diametrically opposed to his very theological paradigms?
III.
The Context of the “Sin Boldly” Statement
It’s important now to establish the literary context that contains Luther’s statement to “sin boldly.” After the Diet of Worms in April 1521, Luther found himself in great danger. The papacy and the Emperor were united against him. To be deemed a heretic almost certainly meant death. In 1521, Luther had been placed in hiding after the Diet of Worms. He stayed in an empty Castle, the Wartburg, near his boyhood school town Eisenach.
Luther wrote many letters from the Wartburg. On August 1, 1521 Luther wrote to Phillip Melanchthon. The letter is now but a fragment. It has no address, salutation, or signature, but scholars are certain whom it came from and whom it went to. The majority of the letter has nothing to do with “sinning boldly.” Luther discusses a variety of topics: “Commenting on Karlstadt’s theses of June 21 and July 19, Luther develops his ideas on clerical and monastic celibacy, on communion “in both kinds,” on the private mass, and on the dynamics of faith.”[16]
The letter itself begins mid-thought, as if the first page were missing. Luther is in the middle of discussing marriage and celibacy: “Paul speaks very openly concerning the priests. He says demons have forbidden them to marry. Since the voice of Paul is the voice of the Divine Majesty, I do not doubt that it must be trusted in this matter. Therefore even if they have consented to the devil’s prohibition at the time of their initiation, then now, knowing the true state of the case and with whom they made their pact, the contract should be boldly broken.”[17] Luther then moves on to communion “in both kinds.” During the middle ages, people were denied the element of wine during communion. Since the wine was the actual blood of Christ, people could not be trusted with it- what if it was spilled? Luther discusses whether or not those who receive only one of the communion elements partake in sin. If the Lord’s Supper was both bread and wine, is not failing to partake in both elements a sin? Luther says no (Luther came down critically on Karlstadt, who fought to gain leadership in Wittenberg during Luther’s absence. Karlstadt was teaching that receiving only one element was a sin [18]). Luther though does point to a sinful action in the matter. He points out that only those in charge that deprive the church of both elements are guilty: “Who will deny, however, that they who do consent to [giving only one of the elements] and approve of it—I mean the papists—are not Christians and are guilty of sin?”[19] Luther comes down harshly on the papacy as acting sinfully by withholding the wine from the laity.
Luther tells Melanchthon that he is pleased the people of Wittenberg are receiving both the bread and wine during communion, and that some of the tyranny imposed on the Lord’s Supper by the Papacy has been overcome by this. Luther exhorts Melanchthon, “Let us pray to the Lord, I beseech you, that he hasten to give us a larger portion of his Spirit, for I suspect that the Lord will soon visit Germany, as its unbelief, impiety, and hatred of the gospel deserve.”[20] Indeed, the leaders of the Reformation needed to be strengthened by God’s Spirit: Luther knew restoring correct doctrine and practice to the church would be met with great opposition. Whatever anarchy that arose in Wittenberg would be charged to the account of the Reformers. Luther says, “But of course this plague will then be charged to us on the grounds that we heretics have provoked God, and we will be scorned by men and despised by the people.”[21] While the Reformers are charged with anarchy, the “papists” who really are at fault (since they had corrupted the Lord’s Supper) will come up with reasons why they are not to be blamed: “ [The papists], however, will find excuses for their sins, and will justify themselves; [God will thus prove] that the wicked cannot be made good, either by kindness or by wrath, and that many will be tempted to do evil. The Lord’s will be done.”[22]
The Letter to Melanchthon ends with the famous “sin boldly” statement:
“If you are a preacher of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace; if grace is true, you must bear a true and not a fictitious sin. God does not save people who are only fictitious sinners. Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly, for he is victorious over sin, death, and the world. As long as we are here [in this world] we have to sin. This life is not the dwelling place of righteousness, but, as Peter says, we look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. It is enough that by the riches of God’s glory we have come to know the Lamb that takes away the sin of the world. No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day. Do you think that the purchase price that was paid for the redemption of our sins by so great a Lamb is too small? Pray boldly—you too are a mighty sinner.”[23]
It’s important to work slowly through this striking exhortation to Melanchthon, remembering that Wittenberg was not a calm spiritual community. It was a place under turmoil. Melanchthon was to face trials both from within his own small group of leaders and outside from the political juggernauts of the papacy and the empire. The situations involving marriage, celibacy, and the Lord’s Supper discussed above may seem like debatable academic subjects to the modern reader, but during these early years of the Reformation they were important societal topics that provoked deep emotion. Changes in these practices were changes in the very fabric of society. Luther encourages his co-worker to stand strong in the faith. The very community that Luther was responsible for was in the hands of Melanchthon.[24] Luther’s final exhortation in this letter is for Melanchthon to hold fast to the firm gospel of Jesus Christ. Whatever trouble may come, Melanchthon was to be true to the Gospel.
What follows is a line-by-line analysis of the paragraph containing the exhortation to “sin boldly.”
“If you are a preacher
of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace…”
Luther
exhorts Melanchthon to stand firm and preach the pure gospel. The pure gospel
proclaims God’s true grace. It is a grace that actually forgives all a
man’s sins, without any works of penance geared toward eventual justification.
The papal system Luther was part of taught that God’s grace could be attained
by faith combined good works, and that the sacrament of penance must be carried
out to completely forgive a man for sin. This would be a fictitious grace. As
Ewald Plass points out, “The concept of grace was, of course, not unknown to
Luther the Catholic. But this term, as so many others, had become a ‘weasel
word’ in the Church of Rome, a word emptied of its Scriptural meaning. Thus
grace was turned ‘from the divine source of pardon and forgiveness into
an infused ability (gratia infusa) of man to perform good works for his own
salvation.’ ”[25]
“…if grace is true, you must bear a true and not a
fictitious sin. God does not save people who are only
fictitious sinners.”
What
does Luther mean “fictitious sin”? Perhaps he has in mind what he had
just discussed: people thinking they were sinning by only receiving the bread
and not the wine in the Lord’s Supper. This would indeed be a fictitious sin.
Elsewhere though, Luther describes the “fictitious sins” concocted by the
papacy:
“There are commandments and teachings of the
pope which say nothing at all about faith in Christ, as the Gospel does, but
merely about obedience to him in bodily, trivial, trifling matters, such as the
eating of meat, observing festivals, fasting, dressing, etc. Yet the pope has
emphasized and extolled these far more than God's Word, and they are feared and
followed far more, have more thoroughly terrified and captivated consciences,
and have made hell far hotter than did both God's Law and His Gospel. For they
have given little regard to unbelief, blasphemy, adultery, murder, theft, and
whatever else is opposed to Christ and His command; for these sins penance was
quickly done and forgiveness given. But when someone touched one of the pope's
commandments, the bulls had to come with lightning and thunder. This was called
damned disobedience and brought a man under the ban of the pope. Now heaven and
earth had to tremble in terror. But when sins against God were concerned, sins
in which they themselves are drowned, not a leaf stirred. On the contrary, they
mocked and laughed at the matter in great security, as they do to this day.
Besides this, they persecute and murder in a cruel manner all who esteem God’s
commandment above the commandment of their abomination. The pope wants God and
His Word under him; he wants himself enthroned above them. This is his regime
and nature. Without these he could not be the Antichrist.”[26]
Luther
says that God does not save people who are only “fictitious sinners.” No, God
saves actual sinners. “Luther often called actual sin, as does
Scripture…spiritual adultery.”[27] Luther says all men have a “lust for divinity”: “No sin troubles us as severely as the lust after divinity.
Of course, the lust of the flesh is also a furiously strong urge, yet it is
only a form (of sin) and nothing in comparison with spiritual lust or
fornication.”[28] All actual sins are attempts to deify ourselves. As Ewald Plass points out, “At the heart
of every sin which our corrupt nature moves us to commit is the burning desire
to recognize no one as superior to ourselves…Luther points to this as the
common denominator of all actual sins.”[29] In our zeal to be our own gods, we psychological say, “I
do not believe God’s ways are the right way for me.” Thus, at our spiritual
roots, our actions are the result of unbelief in the heart- a blatant disbelief
that God’s way is the best way. We are all indeed, actual sinners.
“Be a sinner and
sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in
Christ even more boldly, for he is victorious over sin, death, and the world.”
Luther
was prone to strong hyperbole. It's his style, and this statement is a perfect
example. Luther doesn't write analytical theology. He writes profound verbose
sentiment driving one to think deeply.
The
first thing to recognize is that the sentence is a statement of comparison.
Luther's point is not to go out and commit multiple amounts of gleeful sin
everyday, but rather to believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly
despite the sin in our lives. Christians have a real savior. No amount of sin
is too much to be atoned for by a perfect savior whose righteousness is imputed
to the sinner who reaches out in faith. But what then is the practical
application of sinning “boldly”? What is at the heart of this comparison?
Luther explains elsewhere how to take on the attitude of sinning “boldly”:
“Therefore let us arm our hearts with these
and similar statements of Scripture so that, when the devil accuses us by
saying: You are a sinner; therefore you are damned, we can reply: The very fact
that you say I am a sinner makes me want to be just and saved. Nay, you will be
damned, says the devil. Indeed not, I reply, for I take refuge in Christ, who
gave Himself for my sins. Therefore you will accomplish nothing, Satan, by
trying to frighten me by setting the greatness of my sins before me and thus
seducing me to sadness, doubt, despair, hatred, contempt, and blasphemy of God.
Indeed, by calling me a sinner you are supplying me with weapons against
yourself so that I can slay and destroy you with your own sword; for Christ
died for sinners. Furthermore, you yourself proclaim the glory of God to me;
you remind me of God's paternal love for me, a miserable and lost sinner; for
He so loved the world that He gave His Son (John 3:16). Again, whenever you
throw up to me that I am a sinner, you revive in my memory the blessing of
Christ, my Redeemer, on whose shoulders, and not on mine, lie all my sins; for
"the Lord hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all" and "for the
transgression of His people was He stricken" (Is. 53:6-8). Therefore when
you throw up to me that I am a sinner, you are not terrifying me; you are
comforting me beyond measure.”[30]
The strong hyperbolic comparison Luther makes between
“sinning boldly” and believing and rejoicing in Christ “even more boldly” comes
clear. When assaulted by the fear and doubt of Christ’s love because of
previous sins or the remnants of sin in one’s life, one is thrust back into the
arms of Christ “on whose shoulders, and not on mine,
lie all my sins…”. Rather than promoting a
license to sin by saying “sin boldly,” Luther’s point is to simply compare the
sinner to the perfect savior. Left in our sins we will face nothing but death
and damnation. By Christ’s victory over sin, death, and the world, we stand
clothed in His righteousness, the recipients of His grace, no matter what we
have done.
It also should be pointed out, Luther was not simply telling Melanchthon to try really hard to be “bold”. Elsewhere Luther points out that the Holy Spirit is that which makes one bold. Preaching on John 15: ‘And ye also bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning,’ Luther tells his hearers that Christ is saying:
“Yes; then, first, when you become certain of your faith
through the Holy Spirit, who is your witness, you must also bear witness of me,
for to that end I chose you to be apostles. You have heard my words and
teachings and have seen my works and life and all things that you are to
preach. But the Holy Spirit must first be present; otherwise you can do
nothing, for the conscience is too weak. Yes, there is no sin so small that the
conscience could vanquish it, even if it were so trifling a one as laughing in
church, Again, in the presence of death the conscience is far too weak to offer
resistance. Therefore another must come and give to the timid, despairing
conscience, courage to go through everything, although all sins be upon it. And
it must, at the same time, be an almighty courage, like he alone can give who
ministers strength in such a way that the courage, which before a rustling leaf
could cause to fear, is now not afraid of all the devils, and the conscience
that before could not restrain laughing, now restrains all sins.”[31]
“As long as we are here [in this world] we
have to sin. This life is not the dwelling place of righteousness,
but, as Peter says, we look for new heavens and a new
earth in which righteousness dwells. It is enough that
by the riches of God’s glory we have come to know the Lamb that
takes away the sin of the world.”
This is simply the same message
Paul proclaims in Romans 7. Even though a man has been justified by Christ and
had His righteousness imputed to him, the remnants of sin still remain. Paul says,
“For we know that the law is spiritual, but I am carnal, sold
under sin. For what I am doing, I do not understand. For what I will to
do, that I do not practice; but what I hate, that I do. If, then, I do
what I will not to do, I agree with the law that it is good.
But now, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells
in me. For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh) nothing good
dwells; for to will is present with me, but how to perform what is good
I do not find. For the good that I will to do, I do not
do; but the evil I will not to do, that I practice. Now
if I do what I will not to do, it is no longer I who do it, but
sin that dwells in me. I find then a law, that evil is present with me,
the one who wills to do good. For I delight in the law of God according
to the inward man. But I see another law in my members, warring against
the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is
in my members. O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this
body of death? I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, with
the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin.”
For Luther, the remnants of sin were not a license to “sin boldly”. Commenting on Romans 7:17, the sins that remain in a believer’s life are there to be fought:
“Sin remains in the spiritual man for the exercise of grace, the humbling of pride, and the repression of presumption. For he who is not busily at work driving out sin without a doubt has sin by the very fact of this neglect, even though he has committed no further sin for which he may be damned. For we are not called to idleness; we are called to labor against our passions. These would not be without guilt—for they are truly sins, indeed damnable ones — if the mercy of God did not forego imputing them to us. But He does not impute them to those only who manfully undertake the struggle with their failings and, calling upon the grace of God, fight it through. Therefore he who goes to confession should not fancy that he is laying down burdens in order to live a life of ease. On the contrary, he should know that by laying down the burden he is undertaking to serve as a soldier of God and is taking a different burden upon himself, the burden of battling for God against the devil and his own failings. The man who does not know this will suffer a quick relapse. Therefore he who does not intend henceforth to fight—why does he ask to be absolved and to be enrolled in the army of Christ?”[32]
“No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day. Do you think that the purchase price that was paid for the redemption of our sins by so great a Lamb is too small? Pray boldly—you too are a mighty sinner.”
Luther’s
critics often quote this statement. The Catholic scholar Jared Wicks has
correctly pointed out, “One needs to be on the lookout for Luther's
rhetorical flights, and to be judicious in discriminating between the substance
of his message and the linguistic extremes with which he sometimes made his
points.”[33] The
above statement is a perfect example. The point Luther is making is not to go
out and murder or fornicate as much as possible, but rather to point out the
infinite sacrifice of Christ’s atonement. There is no sin that Christ cannot
cover. His atonement was of an infinite value. That this statement was not to
be considered literally is apparent by Luther’s use of argumentum ad absurdum:
do people really commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day? No. Not
even the most heinous God-hating sinner is able to carry out such a daily
lifestyle.
Secondly,
one must recall the recipient of this letter: Phillip Melanchthon. No
historical information exists that indicts Melanchthon of ever murdering or
fornicating, even once. The Lutheran writer W.H.T. Dau presents the absurdity
of the arguments put forth by Roman Catholic authors along these lines:
“ ‘Be a sinner,
and sin bravely, but believe more bravely still’- this is the chef d’oeuvre
of the muck-rackers in Luther’s life…What caused Luther to write these words?
Did Melanchthon contemplate some crime which he was too timid to perpetrate?
According to the horrified expressions of Catholics that must have been the
situation. Luther, in their view, says to Melanchthon: Philip, you are a
simpleton. Why scruple about a sin? You are confined in the trammels of very
narrow-minded moral views. You must get rid of them. Have the courage to be
wicked. Make a hero of yourself by executing some bold piece of iniquity. Be an
‘Uebermensch.’ Sin with brazen unconcern; be a fornicator, a murderer, a
liar, a thief, defy every moral statute,- only do not forget to believe in the
Lord Jesus Christ. His grace is intended, not for hesitating, craven sinners,
but for audacious, spirited, high minded criminals…Can the reader induce
himself to believe that Luther advised Melanchthon to do what he himself knew
was a moral impossibility to himself because of his relation to God?…What brave
sin did Melanchthon actually commit upon being thus advised by Luther?”[34]
On the
other hand, Luther ends by saying, “you too are a mighty sinner” so “pray
boldly.” Here, Luther points out
the seriousness of sin. While Christ’s sacrifice and work are infinite enough
to cover the most heinous of sins, any sin in a person’s life makes them
a “mighty sinner” in need of a savior. A little sinner
winds up in Hell just as the mighty sinners do, thus we are all really mighty
enough sinners to deserve damnation.
That
Luther’s words should not be taken literally is clear from statements he made
elsewhere about heinous sin:
“Works only reveal faith, just as fruits only show the tree, whether
it is a good tree. I say, therefore, that works justify, that is, they show
that we have been justified, just as his fruits show that a man is a Christian
and believes in Christ, since he does not have a feigned faith and life before
men. For the works indicate whether I have faith. I conclude, therefore, that
he is righteous, when I see that he does good works. In God’s eyes that
distinction is not necessary, for he is not deceived by hypocrisy. But it is
necessary among men, so that they may correctly understand where faith is and
where it is not. As Paul says, we ought not to trust a faith which is false, as
when someone believes he is a part of the church although he meanwhile still
whores [I Cor. 5:11]. In this I see that he is not a good tree and when he
glories saying, “I am a part,” I can argue against him, “You are not part of
the church, because your works are evil.” Therefore, those works are also
evidence to himself and to others about him whether he has the true faith. For
those who glory that they are Christians and do not show this faith by such
works, as this sinful woman does, but persist up to the present and live in
open sins, in whoring and adultery, are not Christians at all. For the
Christian shows his life and that he has been made a Christian by love and good
works and flees all vices. We should not be a part of the church in number
only, as the hypocrites, but also by our works, so that our heavenly Father may
be glorified. Love merits forgiveness of sins, that is, love reveals that his
sins have been forgiven.”[35]
For Luther, outward sins like murder and adultery were obviously bad. But these were only a symptom of unbelief, which is the root of all outward sin. In a sermon on Luke 18, Luther discusses the faith of the Publican as compared to the works of the Pharisee:
“Now let us better see and
hear what the Lord says to this. There stands the publican and humbles himself,
says nothing of fasting, nothing of his good works, nor of anything. Yet the Lord
says that his sins are not so great as the sins of the hypocrite; even in spite
of anyone now exalting himself above the lowest sinner. If I exalt myself a
finger's breadth above my neighbor, or the vilest sinner, then am I cast down.
For the publican during his whole life did not do as many and as great sins as
this Pharisee does here when he says: I thank thee God that, I am not as other
men are; and lies enough to burst all heaven. From him you hear no word like:
"God, be thou merciful to me a sinner!" God's mercy, sympathy,
patience and love are all forgotten by him, while God is nothing but pure
mercy, and he who does not know this, thinks there is no God, as in Psalm 14:1:
"The fool hath Said in his heart, There is no God." So it is with an
unbeliever who does not know himself. Therefore I say one thing more, if he had
committed the vilest sin and deflowered virgins, it would not have been as bad
as when he says: "I thank thee God, that I am not as the rest of men,
extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican." Yes, yes, do
I hear you have no need of God and despise his goodness, mercy, love and
everything that God is? Behold, these are thy sins. Hence the public gross sins
that break out are insignificant; but unbelief which is in the heart and we
cannot see, this is the real sin in which monks and priests strut forth; these
lost and corrupt ones are sunk head and ears in this sin, and pretend to be
entirely free from it.”[36]
In the above statement, one can see Luther’s brilliance with language and theological insight. How many of us think of unbelief as an extreme heinous sin? Compared to blatant fornication or murder, unbelief seems to us as not so bad. Luther though realizes that unbelief is a sin against a holy God, and thus more heinous than any amount of murder or adultery. A sin against a perfect infinite being deserves a perfect infinite punishment. All of us are indeed, mighty sinners.
One of the enjoyable aspects of studying Luther’s theology is the ease it
takes to read his writings. His sermons are lucid and simple. Most of his
treatises are devoid of difficult theological and philosophical jargon. Humor
and wit, as well as profound theological insight can be found frequently. It’s
no wonder the great Catholic historian Joseph Lortz commented, “Luther was a
genius with language. Spontaneously his thoughts found concrete expression in
the most sensitive of linguistic phrasing. It would perhaps be more exact to say
that his thoughts take form in words!”[37] “One is tempted simply to quote him--his
wonderful outpouring of self, his tireless thrust to discover and express, his
massive power, the immeasurable height, breadth, and depth of the message, the
astounding vitality and fullness present in this man so captivated by the
spirit of Scripture.”[38]
But on the other hand, Luther can be easy to misinterpret. Literary paradigms and context must be carefully evaluated. There are also certain theological paradigms that must be understood in order to come to a full understanding of his writings. Part of the reason “sin boldly” is so frequently misinterpreted is for this very reason. Robert Preus speculates, “Melanchthon, to whom these words [sin boldly] were addressed, probably did not understand them fully, and neither have many other people.”[39] I would not be so ‘bold’ to make such a statement about Melanchthon, but Preus is simply stating the obvious: Luther’s “sin boldly” statement is easily misconstrued.
Even though below I document examples of “sin boldly” being misinterpreted, simply because one is Roman Catholic in one’s theology does not necessarily mean Luther cannot be understood. Not all Catholics misunderstand Luther’s theology or misinterpret Luther’s “sin boldly” statement. For instance, an article at Catholic Answers from This Rock Magazine articulated an accurate interpretation:
“Luther had failed to find
peace of soul in ascetic self-discipline and efforts at "good works."
He never declared a good life unnecessary. His "pecca fortiter sed
crede fortius" (sin boldly but believe still more firmly) was not
meant to be an encouragement to yield to sin without scruple. He intended
simply that however great a sinner one may be, granted repentance, he can be
justified solely by faith. But to be zealous for good works, thinking them to
be a means to salvation, was to manifest a lack of faith in God's power to
save.”[40]
Despite my strong disagreement with the majority of the article, the article did at least correctly note that Luther was not against living an upright life, nor was he against good works. Luther didn’t encourage sinning. The article correctly points out Luther held sinners can only be justified by faith alone. Works will not contribute anything to salvation.
Unfortunately, many Roman Catholics do misunderstand Luther’s words. The fault in most cases should lie on the difficult nature of Luther’s words, rather than on an intended vilification. Without knowledge of Luther’s underlying theological paradigms, the historical context of Luther’s life, and the immediate context the words occur in, misunderstanding is almost guaranteed. There are though, some professional Roman Catholic writers that should know better due to their knowledge of Luther and familiarity with his writings. To these we now turn.
Father Patrick O’Hare published his book, The Facts About Luther on the 400th anniversary of the posting of the 95 Theses in 1917. The book eventually sank below the surface and went out of print. It would have remained obscure, but the Catholic publisher Tan books resurrected it in 1987, and its probably more popular now than it was when first published. The Facts About Luther claims “The Luther of fiction is being more and more obscured by the Luther of fact.” The book promises that “The whole gamut of the apostate’s life is here described in a calm, impartial manner which permits no gainsaying…The reader may take up this work with assurance that here there is no unfair attack upon the founder of Protestantism. It is not with a spirit of bitterness or bigotry that Monsignor O’Hare describes the real Luther.”[41] O’Hare did have access to a large corpus of Luther’s writings, as well as having access to a great number of Protestant historical sources. O’Hare should have been able to understand Luther’s “sin boldly” statement. Unfortunately, he states,
“ ‘Be a sinner,’ [Luther]
says, ‘sin boldly and fearlessly.’ The command embodied in the unsuspicious
words set at naught all the laws of morality and gives wide scope to human
freedom and to disorder. The thought of the degrading recommendation makes the
blood run cold in the veins of decent, law-abiding people.”[42]
“Luther's pronouncement, ‘Be
a sinner and sin boldly,’ has only one meaning, namely, a command to transgress
the Divine Law, insult God and open up the way to the commission of crime and
iniquity.”[43]
O’Hare’s misinterpretation of
Luther’s “sin boldly” is due to the gross literalism he applies to the text. By
setting up a strawman interpretation, he then proceeds to hurl invective at
Luther relentlessly for about two pages. Protestants who correctly avoid such
gross literalism O’Hare says, “have edited and interpreted the
recommendation so as to give it a turn and a meaning altogether unwarranted and untenable.”[44] O’Hare says,
“Luther said: ‘Be a sinner and sin boldly.’ His supporters, to hoodwink and deceive their followers, claim that the imperative mood used by Luther is not here to be read imperatively, and according to them, ‘Be a sinner and sin boldly’ means, ‘even supposing thou art a sinner and dost sin boldly.’ This interpretation is ingenious, but like all their methods of defense to escape from the infamy of Luther's teaching, as Anderdon remarks, "the deploying of imperatives into subjunctives, suppositions, exaggerations, reductions ad absurdum, will never make the imperative mood read otherwise than as a clear, distinct injunction. Until some more formidable line of defense be invented, we must take Luther's words to mean, as they manifestly indicate, a recommendation, an exhortation and an injunction to mutiny, rebellion and disobedience to the Supreme Lawgiver, who directed all to observe and not disrespect His Commandments.”[45]
Contrary to O’Hare’s conclusion, this passage can be
read otherwise, that is, in context. Simply because the imperative mood is used
does not mean the command is literal in context. One wonders if Father O’Hare
would apply the same literalness to the Apostle Paul’s words in Galatians 5:12:
“As for those agitators, I wish they would go the
whole way and emasculate themselves!” Did Paul really wish people would emasculate themselves, or
was he using sarcasm to establish a point?
Father O’Hare
misrepresents Luther repeatedly. He holds Luther was not only mad,
but also morally depraved and corrupt. He asserts that Luther in the Wartburg
was in close touch with Satan. Luther lived an indecent life, disparaged
celibacy and virginity, sanctioned adultery, dishonored marriage, authorized
prostitution and polygamy, and was a drunkard found in the tavern. Luther was a
blasphemer, a libertine, a revolutionary, a hater of religious vows, a disgrace
to the religious calling, and the propagator of immorality and open
licentiousness. O’Hare’s understanding of “sin boldly” serves as a good example
why The Facts About Luther is one of the worst ever written. It shows
that simply because someone has the “facts” doesn’t necessarily mean they’re
presenting the truth.
The Jesuit scholar Hartmann
Grisar delved deeply into Luther studies. His work on Luther spanned multiple
volumes and thousands of pages. His books were considered the standard Catholic
understanding of Luther for decades. Grisar admits to the difficulty of the
“sin boldly” comment. He calls the
statement “the most extravagant paradox.”[46] On
the one hand, Grisar admits the words were rhetorical and not to be taken
literally, but then on the other hand goes on to interpret Luther literally:
“We might, it is true, admit that, in these
words, Luther gave the rein to his well-known inclination to put things in the
strongest light, a tendency to be noticed in some of his other statements… On
the other hand, however, the
close connection between the compromising words and his whole system of sin and
grace, can scarcely be denied; we have here something more than a figure of
rhetoric.”[47]
“However much stress we may be disposed to lay
on Luther's warnings against sin, and whatever allowance we may make for his
rhetoric, still the " Pecca fortiter " stands out as the result of
his revolt against the traditional view of sin and grace, with which his own
doctrine of Justification refused to be reconciled. These inauspicious words
are the culmination of Luther's practical ideas on religion, borne witness to
by so many of his statements, which, at the cost of morality, give the reins to
human freedom and to disorder.”[48]
“Hence the writer of the letter seeks to
convince [Melanchthon] that the strength of the fiducial faith preached by
himself, Luther, was so great, that no sense of sin need trouble a man.”[49]
Grisar takes Luther literally because he believes
Melanchthon was in need of exhortation: “Luther's endeavor was to reassure,
once and for all, Melanchthon who was so prone to anxiety. The latter shrank
from many of the consequences of Luther's doctrines, and at that time was
possibly also a prey to apprehension concerning the forgiveness of his own sins.”[50] Grisar then chastises Luther
for his literal advise to “sin boldly” and offers what he should have said to
Melanchthon:
“Luther, here and throughout
the letter, does not say what he ought necessarily to have said to one weighed
down by the consciousness of sin; of remorse and compunction we hear nothing
whatever, nor does he give due weight and importance to the consciousness of
guilt; he misrepresents grace, making it appear as a mere outward, magical
charm, by which—according to an expression which cannot but offend every
religious mind— a man is justified even though he be a murderer and a libertine
a thousand times over. Luther's own words here are perhaps the best refutation
of the Lutheran doctrine of Justification, for he speaks of sin, even of the
worst, in a way that well lays bare the weaknesses of the system of fiducial
faith.”[51]
Given Grisar’s knowledge of Luther, one would have expected him to be
able to interpret Luther in light of Luther’s many statements on the
relationship of faith and works and the growing of godliness in the Christian
life, as well as Luther’s strong stance on sin and morality. Rather, Grisar
takes two pages to discuss one obscure paragraph from a letter fragment. Grisar
goes a step further by saying these words are “perhaps the best refutation
of the Lutheran doctrine of Justification.” Why? Elsewhere Grisar explains,
“In lieu of interior contrition, self humiliation and the penitential
spirit, justification is made dependent upon the presumptuous apprehension of
the merits of Christ, and sin loses its terrifying character for the believer.”[52] Here Grisar shows he misses Luther’s understanding
of sin, salvation, and sanctification completely. For Luther, the preaching of
law drove one to humbly to Christ, Christ’s work is received with the most
exuberant joy, and one’s life is lived as a servant to God.
Grisar ultimately sees the “sin boldly” statement as “an
evident mental derangement.”[53] In the overall scope of Grisar’s
work, his use of the “sin boldly” statement is but one example of the generally
accepted flawed tenor of his work. He interprets Luther as a monk obsessed with the lust of the flesh, suffering from a
pathological manic-depressive personality: Luther’s view of justification by
faith alone came from his own decadence. ‘Faith alone’ was but a ploy to
justify Luther’s immorality and an excuse to relieve him of the monastic ideals
he began with. Grisar argued “Luther leaves no actual Grace which makes for
righteousness and which dwells within man himself, for he sees in God a will to
grace, not to view us as sinners and to lend us his active support in fighting
sins.” [54]
American Catholics in the first
half of the twentieth century were guided in their understanding of Luther by
an article in the Catholic Encyclopedia by George Ganss. Ganss presented a Luther who was wild tempered, depressed,
mentally ill, and a victim of lust seeking unbridled sexual license
through his teaching. Here is his understanding of Luther’s teaching on
justification by faith alone:
“[Luther] convinced himself that man, as a consequence of original sin, was totally depraved, destitute of free will, that all works, even though directed towards the good, were nothing more than an outgrowth of his corrupted will, and in the judgments of God in reality mortal sins. Man can be saved by faith alone. Our faith in Christ makes His merits our possession, envelops us in the garb of righteousness, which our guilt and sinfulness hide, and supplies in abundance every defect of human righteousness. ‘Be a sinner and sin on bravely, but have stronger faith and rejoice in Christ, who is the victor of sin, death, and the world. Do not for a moment imagine that this life is the abiding place of justice: sin must be committed. To you it ought to be sufficient that you acknowledge the Lamb that takes away the sins of the world, the sin cannot tear you away from him, even though you commit adultery a hundred times a day and commit as many murders’ ”[55]
In Ganns’ description of justification, “sin boldly” serves to substantiate Luther’s view. Ganns leaves out Luther’s understanding of a living faith that shows itself by works. One is left with a gross caricature. As Patrick Carey his so correctly noted of Ganns’ article: “…Ganss failed to examine in any detail the substance of Luther's teachings…”[56] Similarly, in their entry on Justification, the Catholic Encyclopedia likewise uses Luther’s “sin boldly” comment to explain the Protestant view of justification, promoting the same caricature as their Luther entry:
“Since neither charity nor
good works contribute anything towards justification -- inasmuch as faith alone
justifies -- their absence subsequently cannot deprive the just man of anything
whatever. There is only one thing that might possibly divest him of justification,
namely, the loss of fiduciary faith or of faith in general. From this point of
view we get a psychological explanation of numerous objectionable passages in
Luther's writings, against which even Protestant with deep moral sense, such as
Hugo Grotius and George Bull, earnestly protested. Thus we find in one of
Luther's letters, written to Melancthon in 1521, the following sentence:
"Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ more
strongly, who triumphed over sin, death, and the world; as long as we live
here, we must sin." Could anyone do more to degrade St. Paul's concept of
justification than Luther did in the following blasphemy: "If adultery
could be committed in faith, it would not be a sin"?[57]
The Justification entry continues
by positing Luther’s sola fide is a doctrine (along with sola scriptura)
founded on self-deception:
“Since, however, neither maxim can be found in the Bible, every Catholic is
forced to conclude that Protestantism from its very beginning and foundation is
based on self-deception.”[58] While the Catholic
Encyclopedia declares justification by faith alone based on a “self-deception”,
the actual deception is their caricature of Luther’s teaching. Luther taught
good works as the result of justification, and believed that a battle against
sin was to be fought throughout life. Protestants distinguish justification
from sanctification. They never so viciously separate them as Catholics
suggest.
Henry
O’Connor: Luther’s Own Statements- His Teaching and Results
Henry O’Connor wrote Luther’s Own Statements
Concerning His Teaching and its Results. The book is an old small anthology
of Luther quotes, peppered with vilifying commentary from O’Connor. The author
claims to have compiled the quotes from the original sources “Nearly
two-thirds of the matter contained in this pamphlet is taken from the original
editions of Luther’s own Works, as published in Wittenberg, under the very eye
of the Reformer of Germany himself.”[59] He says “I have taken special
care not to quote anything, that would have a different meaning, if read with
the full context.”[60]
O’Connor delves immediately into Luther’s “sin
boldly” comment (third edition preface, page ii). He says,
“I am of the opinion that, if we merely consider the words just quoted, it would be an exaggeration to say that Luther ordered his disciple to sin, or that he even positively advised him to do so. To my mind the words mean: ‘As far as the certainty of our own salvation is concerned, it does not matter one bit whether we sin or not, as long as we put our trust in Christ.’ Thus whereas Christ preaches hatred of every sin, Luther proclaims indifference toward every kind of sin, with the only exception of unbelief.”[61]
O’Connor begins well enough: Luther did not order Melanchthon to sin. But beyond that, his interpretation derails immediately. The rest of his statement shows an obvious confusion of Luther’s understanding of faith and works. It indeed does matter “whether we sin or not” because (as Luther repeatedly taught) true faith shows itself by its good works. Both Christ and Luther preached a hatred of sin. Luther never proclaimed an “indifference toward every kind of sin.” O’Connor concludes, “Therefore, Luther, the self-constituted Lawgiver of the sixteenth century, allows and recommends what God the supreme Lawgiver of all ages, past, present, and future, forbids.”[62] O’Connor sees Luther as fundamentally teaching lawlessness.
O’Connor, who claimed to read Luther “in context” ignored Luther’s basic theology, or either grossly misunderstood it. O’Connor says of Luther’s teaching on justification: “Luther received the full and unqualified approval of the Devil for these new doctrines. It was the Devil who spoke in favor of the doctrine of justification by faith alone, and against Mass, Mary, and the Saints.”[63] By the end of the book, O’Connor is convinced Luther “pretends to be a Reformer” and was sent by Satan.[64]
There are many Catholic apologetic websites utilizing the “sin boldly” quote. For these, their misunderstandings are most likely the result of not reading any (or very little) of Luther’s writings. They have simply captured a phrase and run with it. In a desire to appeal emotionally via apologetic argument, most of the misinterpretations are simply the result of over-literalizing Luther. Like some of the authors reviewed above, the Protestant distinction between justification and sanctification is misunderstood, wrongly said to be “separated” in such way to allow for a life of heinous sin. On an emotional level, Rome is said to be the great defender of morality, while the “founder of Protestantism” was a great antinomian. To convert to Roman Catholicism is to join “Christian morality.” To remain a Protestant is to think, “You can do whatever you want and still be saved.”
The Catholic Culture website takes Luther
quite literally. Commenting on the “sin boldly” statement they say: “So if a
man after a sex orgy would go out and kill a thousand people with an automatic
rifle, and then kill himself, he would go instantly to the eternal embrace of
God.”[65]
An article at the Catholic Apologetics Network states that Luther didn’t think a moral life mattered: “Luther is actually saying that our actions -- even the most sinful actions imaginable -- don't matter! He is saying we can commit any sin we want -- willfully, presumptuously, purposefully -- and we will not separate ourselves from God! After all, we require nothing more than "faith" to be saved. What we do is incidental.”[66]
Catholic Answers hosts an article that Takes Luther literally by appealing to a “logical conclusion”: “Logically, if one follows out Luther's fancy, a man who goes out and kills several others and then turns the gun on himself should go at once to be joined to the infinite purity of God! Luther wrote, ‘Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly....No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day.’ ”[67]
In another article at Catholic Answers, an author states, “In our own day, the antinomian temptation tugs at us from every side, not only in the sophistical subjectivizing of the faith in many mainline Protestant institutions, but also in the pedestrian libertinism of fraternity boys heading off for weekends of naughtiness with bravado cries, echoing Luther’s behest to ‘sin boldly.’ ”[68] Contrary to this statement, Luther would abhor such behavior done by “boys heading off for weekends of naughtiness.”
EWTN hosts many articles commenting on the “sin boldly” statement:
“Romans 1.5 what we have
just said: ‘the obedience that faith is.’ In contrast, Luther said if we have
faith, we need not obey… What a monstrous error! Faith includes obedience, as
Paul said in Romans 1.5, 1 Cor 6.9-10, and Gal 5.16-25. and as the
<Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible>. Yet Luther said if you have
faith, you need not obey at all.”[69]
“Luther thought if we have faith, we can disobey God. But faith
includes obedience, and so cannot justify disobedience.”[70]
“… [P]oor Luther did not see
that faith includes obedience to God, and so he wrote: "Be a sinner and
sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly.”[71]
“[Luther] urged us to be
corrupt…What a foul person.”[72]
“Luther hoped to solve this
problem for himself by his "discovery" of justification by faith,
which for him meant that it made no
difference if he did sin mortally all the time… As a certain bumper sticker
puts it: ‘Christians are not perfect, just forgiven.’ In other words,
Christians can sin as much as they want -- they will get away with it. Others,
for the same sins, go to hell.”[73]
“Luther really was
antinomian, Paul was not…”[74]
The Coming Home Network presents an example of misrepresenting justification by faith alone via the “sin boldly” quote. The argument, put forth in the form of a testimony of conversion to Catholicism, functions on a purely emotional level:
“I knew that we are saved by
the free gift of God’s grace; there is nothing we can do to earn our salvation
(cf. Eph. 2:8-9). But the simple formula of “faith alone” did not do justice to
the totality of Scripture. How could we reconcile Martin Luther’s doctrine of
forensic justification and imputed righteousness with the clear teaching of the
Bible?“ Do not let anyone lead you astray,” said the Apostle John. “He who does
what is right is righteous, just as He is righteous” (1 John 3:7). Luther said,
“No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery
thousands of times each day” (Let Your Sins Be Strong, 1521). But the Apostle
Paul warned, “Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the Kingdom of
God?” (1 Cor. 6:9). Was the doctrine of Sola Fide misleading countless people
into a false sense of security? I remembered the Lord’s stinging warning in
Matthew 7:21. “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the
Kingdom of Heaven, but only he who does the will of My Father Who is in
Heaven.” I wondered. Had Martin Luther really “rediscovered” the gospel? Or had
he invented something new.”[75]
The Catholic
Analysis blog describes problems with antinomianism among Roman
Catholics, and links the problem to a caricature of Luther’s teaching: “Like Luther, they emphasize faith
alone to the detriment of personal virtue and avoiding personal sin. They
de-emphasize the need to observe the commandments as too legalistic, and so the
sacrament of penance is demoted and virtually abandoned, especially in the form
requiring individual confession. The result is antinomianism-- a fancy word for
those who believe that Christians are free from the moral law. In some of his
more extreme outbursts, Luther himself urged Christians to "sin
boldly" because all depended on faith alone.”[76]
Mariology.com sees Luther’s “sin boldly” comment as an opportunity to really be free to sin: “Once we realize that our choices have consequences in the spiritual world and for our ultimate destiny, we will focus on doing God's will. If we are lulled into an illusory belief that we are free to sin without fear of consequence once we "accept Christ" (as Luther said, "Be a sinner, and sin boldly"), then we have set ourselves on a dangerous path. We must realize that our spiritual and moral choices affect the state of our souls. And we are free to do right and wrong.”[77] Here, Luther would respond that no one following the theological paradigm of Mariology.com is really “free to do right and wrong” in a God pleasing way. Rather, if one is doing works because they worried about the eternal state of their soul, they are doing works, not to the glory of God, but to the eventual glory of themselves. Luther’s doctrine of faith and works actually provided real freedom: people do works out of thankfulness to God for salvation.
Dave Armstrong claimed Luther completely separated faith and works in one of his early evaluations of Luther:
“This view of total human
depravity was the premise of Luther's view of justification, in which man is
merely declared righteous, while still being in essence and behavior a sinner.
Luther thought that works were not meritorious in the least, relative to man's
standing before God. He attempted to completely separate works and grace as no
one ever had before. This false dichotomy brings forth many absurd
utterances…Luther's famous letter to his cohort Philip Melanchthon, although no
doubt at least in part typically humorous and sarcastic, cannot but shock
nonetheless: "Be a sinner, and sin boldly, but believe more boldly still .
. We must sin as long as we are what we are . . . Sin shall not drag us away
from Him even should we commit fornication or murder, thousands and thousands
of times a day."…Belief was therefore completely separated from action in
a very real sense. The inherent dangers in such a radical view are
self-evident.”[78]
Contrary to Armstrong, in Luther’s theology belief and action are not separated. As Paul Althaus notes for Luther, “This new obedience [brought about from justification] depends on faith. That, however, does not exhaust their relationship. This new obedience is for this very reason significant for faith, as the hallmark of the fact that it really is faith. If faith is the actual basis of the work, then the work becomes the basis for knowing we have faith.”[79]
VI.
Quotations From Luther on Faith And Works
The following are quotes from Martin Luther concerning the relationship between faith and works. While Luther’s “sin boldly” comment gets center stage, the quote in actuality is non-representative of his views on faith and works. The quote “sin boldly” is an obscure saying of Luther’s from a fragment of a letter. Luther’s actual consistent understanding of faith, works, sin and sanctification abound throughout his writings.
Below are only samplings of a large corpus of statements from Luther all testifying to the same idea: justification is by faith alone unto good works done for the good of one’s neighbor. As a form of contrast, Luther often talked about what types of works were not pleasing to God. Luther distinguished between true and false works. Quotes addressing this distinction have also been provided.
Many of the quotes below come from Luther’s sermons. The reason: “[Luther’s] leading thoughts were always faith and charity, justification and sanctification, giving to each its proper place and its due importance. He did not preach sanctification at the expense of justification, a sin which many sectarian preachers are guilty; but he did not fail to emphasize the necessity of the Christian life. His sermons were immensely practical, as all preaching, in order to serve its purpose should be.”[80]
Primary Sources:
Martin Luther, Luther’s Works Volumes 1-55 (editors
J. J. Pelikan, H. C. Oswald & H. T. Lehmann, Ed.) [Philadelphia: Fortress
Press 1999, c1967] (Hereafter referred to as “LW”)
Martin Luther, The Sermons of Martin Luther Volumes
1-7 (Michigan: Baker Books, 2000)
Secondary Sources:
Paul Althaus, The Theology of Martin Luther (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1963)
Ewald Plass, What Luther Says Volumes 1-3
(St. Louis: Concordia Publishing house, 1959)
a. Living
Faith, Dead Faith, Works, and the Law
“I have often said that
there are two kinds of faith. First, a faith in which you indeed believe that
Christ is such a man as he is described and proclaimed here and in all the
Gospels, but do not believe that he is such a man for you, and are in doubt
whether you have any part in him and think: Yes, he is such a man to others, to
Peter, Paul, and the blessed saints; but who knows that he is such to me and
that I may expect the same from him and may confide in it, as these saints did?
Behold, this faith is nothing, it does not receive Christ nor enjoy him, neither
can it feel any love and affection for him or from him. It is a faith about
Christ and not in or of Christ, a faith which the devils also have as well as
evil men…That alone can be called Christian faith, which believes without
wavering that Christ is the Saviour not only to Peter and to the saints but
also to you. Your salvation does not depend on the fact that you believe Christ
to be the Saviour of the godly, but that he is a Saviour to you and has become
your own. Such a faith will work in you love for Christ and joy in him, and
good works will naturally follow. If they do not, faith is surely not present:
for where faith is, there the Holy Ghost is and must work love and good works.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1:21-22]
“For it is impossible for him who believes
in Christ, as a just Savior, not to love and to do good. If, however, he does
not do good nor love, it is sure that faith is not present. Therefore man knows
by the fruits what kind of a tree it is, and it is proved by love and deed
whether Christ is in him and he believes in Christ. As St. Peter says in 2 Pet.
1, 10: "Wherefore, brethren, give the more diligence to make your calling
and election sure; for if ye do these things, ye shall never stumble," that
is, if you bravely practice good works you will be sure and cannot doubt that
God has called and chosen you.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1:40]
“But here we must take to heart the good
example of Christ in that he appeals to his works, even as the tree is known by
its fruits, thus rebuking all false teachers, the pope, bishops, priests and
monks to appear in the future and shield themselves by his name, saying,
"We are Christians;" just as the pope is boasting that he is the
vicar of Christ. Here we have it stated that where the works are absent, there
is also no Christ. Christ is a living, active and fruit- bearing character who
does not rest, but works unceasingly wherever he is. Therefore, those bishops
and teachers that are not doing the works of Christ, we should avoid and
consider as wolves.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1:93]
“But you say I would indeed await
[Christ’s] coming with joy, if I were holy and without sin. I should answer,
what relief do you find in fear and flight? It would not redeem you from sin if
you were to be filled with terror for a thousand years. The damned are
eternally filled with fear of that day, but this does not take away their sin;
yea, this fear rather increases sin and renders man unfit to appear without sin
on that day when it comes. Fear must pass out of the soul and there must enter
in a desire for righteousness and for that day. But if you really desire to be
free from sin and to be holy, then give thanks to God and continue to desire to
be more free from sin. Would to God that such desire were so sincere and
powerful in you as to bring you to your death.” [Sermons
of Martin Luther 1:76-77]
“What Augustine says is
indeed true: He who has created you without yourself will not save you without
yourself. Works are necessary for salvation, but they do not cause salvation;
for faith alone gives life. For the sake of hypocrites it should be said that
good works are necessary for salvation. Works must be done, but it does not
follow from this that works save… Works save externally, that is, they testify
that we are just and that in a man there is that faith which saves him
internally, as Paul says: ‘With the heart man believeth unto righteousness, and
with the mouth confession is made unto salvation’.” [What Luther Says 3:
1509]
“Though we see, hear, understand and must
confess that Christian life is faith in God and love to our needy neighbor, yet
there is no progress. This one clings to his religious ceremonies and his own
works, that one is scraping all to himself and helps no one. Even those who
gladly hear and understand the doctrine of pure faith do not proceed to serve
their neighbor, as though they expected to be saved by faith without works:
they see not that their faith is not faith, but a shadow of faith, just as the
picture in the mirror is not the face itself, but only a reflection of the
same, as St. James so beautifully writes, saying, "But be ye doers of the
word, and not hearers only, deluding your own selves. For if anyone is a hearer
of the word and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in
a mirror: for he beholdeth himself, and goeth away, and straightway forgetteth
what manner of man he was," James 1, 22-25. So also there within
themselves many behold a reflection of true faith when they hear and speak of
the Word, but as soon as the hearing and speaking are done, they are concerned
about other affairs and are not doing according to it, and thus they always
forget about the fruit of faith, namely, Christian love, of which Paul also
says, "For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power," I Cor.
4, 20.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1:112-113]
“But, as has often been said, faith changes the person and makes out of
an enemy a child, so mysteriously that the external works, walk and
conversation remain the same as before, when they are not by nature wicked
deeds. Therefore faith brings with it the entire inheritance and highest good
of righteousness and salvation, so that these need not be sought in works, as
the false teachers of good works would have us believe. For he who is a child
of God has already God's inheritance through his sonship. If then faith gives
this sonship, it is manifest that good works should be done freely, to the
honour of God, since they already possess salvation and the inheritance from
God through faith.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1:210]
“But this birth properly shows its
power in times of temptation and death. There it becomes evident who is born
again, and who is not. Then the old light, reason, struggles and wrestles and
is loath to leave its fancies and desires, is unwilling to consider and resort
to the Gospel, and let go its own light. But those who are born again, or are
then being born again, spend their lives in peace and obedience to the Gospel,
confide in and cling to the witness of John, and let go, their light, life,
property, honour, and all they have. Therefore they come to the eternal
inheritance, as real children.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1:213]
“We must therefore most certainly
maintain that where there is no faith there also can be no good works; and
conversely, that there is no faith where there are no good works. Therefore
faith and good works should be so closely joined together that the essence of
the entire Christian life consists in both.” [Martin
Luther, as cited by Paul Althaus, The Theology of Martin Luther [Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1963], 246,
footnote 99]
“Works are a certain sign, like a
seal on a letter, which make me certain that my faith is genuine. As a result
if I examine my heart and find that my works are done in love, then I am
certain that my faith is genuine. If I forgive, then my forgiving makes me
certain that my faith is genuine and assures me and demonstrates my faith to me.” [Martin Luther, as cited by Paul Althaus, The Theology of Martin
Luther [Philadelphia: Fortress
Press, 1963], 247, footnote 106]
“Works assure us and bear witness
before men and the brethren and even before our own selves that we truly
believe and that we are sons of God in hope and heirs of eternal life.” [Martin Luther, as cited by Paul Althaus, The Theology of Martin
Luther [Philadelphia: Fortress
Press, 1963], 247, footnote 106]
“Love is evidence of faith and gives
us firm and certain confidence in the mercy of God; thus we are commanded to
make our calling certain by good works (II Peter 1:10). When works follow it
becomes apparent that we have faith…” [Martin Luther, as cited by Paul Althaus, The Theology of Martin
Luther [Philadelphia: Fortress Press,
1963], 247, footnote 106
“True faith is not
idle. We can, therefore, ascertain and recognize those who have true faith from
the effect or from what follows.” [LW 34:183
“See, as now no one
is without some commission and calling, so no one is without some kind of work,
if he desires to do what is right. Every one therefore is to take heed to
continue in his calling, look to himself, faithfully do what is commanded him,
and serve God and keep his commandments; then he will have so much to do that
all time will be too short, all places too cramped, all resources of help too
weak.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1: 243]
“Therefore we must
close our eyes, not look at our works, whether they be great, small, honorable,
comtemptible, spiritual, temporal or what kind of an appearance and name they
may have upon earth; but look to the command and to the obedience in the works.
Do they govern you, then the work also is truly right and precious, and
completely godly, although it springs forth as insignificant as a straw.
However, if obedience and God’s commandments do not dominate you, then the work
is not right, but damnable, surely the devil’s own doings, although it were
even so great a work as to raise the dead. For it is decreed that God’s eyes
look not to the works, but to the obedience in the works. Therefore it is his
will, that we look to his command and our calling, of which St. Paul says in
Corinthians 7:17: “As God hath called each, so let him walk.” And St. Peter
says, Ye are to be as faithful, good shepherds or administrators of the
manifold grace of God; so that each one may serve the other, and be helpful to
him by means of what he has received, 1 Peter 4:10. See, here Peter says the
grace and gifts of God are not one but manifold, and each is to tend to his
own, develop the same and through them be of service to others.” [Sermons
of Martin Luther 1:244]
“Now let us turn to the
second part, the outer man. Here we shall answer all those who, offended by the
word “faith” and by all that has been said, now ask, “If faith does all things
and is alone sufficient unto righteousness, why then are good works commanded?
We will take our ease and do no works and be content with faith.” I answer: not
so, you wicked men, not so.” [LW
31:357]
“Although, as I have said,
a man is abundantly and sufficiently justified by faith inwardly, in his
spirit, and so has all that he needs, except insofar as this faith and these
riches must grow from day to day even to the future life; yet he remains in
this mortal life on earth. In this life he must control his own body and have
dealings with men. Here the works begin; here a man cannot enjoy leisure; here
he must indeed take care to discipline his body by fastings, watchings, labors,
and other reasonable discipline and to subject it to the Spirit so that it will
obey and conform to the inner man and faith and not revolt against faith and
hinder the inner man, as it is the nature of the body to do if it is not held
in check. The inner man, who by faith is created in the image of God, is both
joyful and happy because of Christ in whom so many benefits are conferred upon
him; and therefore it is his one occupation to serve God joyfully and without
thought of gain, in love that is not constrained.” [LW 31:358]
“Since by faith the soul is
cleansed and made to love God, it desires that all things, and especially its
own body, shall be purified so that all things may join with it in loving and
praising God. Hence a man cannot be idle, for the need of his body drives him
and he is compelled to do many good works to reduce it to subjection.
Nevertheless the works themselves do not justify him before God, but he does
the works out of spontaneous love in obedience to God and considers nothing
except the approval of God, whom he would most scrupulously obey in all things.”
[LW 31:358]
“Good works do not make a
good man, but a good man does good works; evil works do not make a wicked man,
but a wicked man does evil works.” [LW 31:360]
“But as faith makes a man a
believer and righteous, so faith does good works. Since, then, works justify no
one, and a man must be righteous before he does a good work, it is very evident
that it is faith alone which, because of the pure mercy of God through Christ
and in his Word, worthily and sufficiently justifies and saves the person.”
[LW 31:361]
“Hence the beginning of goodness or
godliness is not in us, but in the Word of God. God must first let his Word
sound in our hearts by which we learn to know and to believe him, and afterwards
do good works.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:339]
“Why then does Christ say
here: "He went down to his house justified?" This is what I have
often said, if faith be true, it will break forth and bear fruit. If the tree
is green and good, it will not cease to blossom forth in leaves and fruit. It
does this by nature. I need not first command it and say: Look here, tree, bear
apples. For if the tree is there and is good, the fruit will follow unbidden.
If faith is present works must follow.” [Sermons of Martin Luther
2.2:340-341]
“Thus faith casts itself on God, and
breaks forth and becomes certain through its works. When this takes place a
person becomes known to me and to other people. For when I thus break forth I
spare neither man nor devil, I cast myself down, and will have nothing to do
with lofty affairs, and will regard myself as the poorest sinner on earth. This
assures me of my, faith. For this is what it says: "This man went down to
his house justified." Thus we attribute salvation as the principal thing
to faith, and works as the witnesses of faith. They make one so certain that he
concludes from the outward life that the faith is genuine.”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 2.2:341]
“This is why St. Luke and
St. James have so much to say about works, so that one says: Yes, I will now
believe, and then he goes and fabricates for himself a fictitious delusion,
which hovers only on the lips as the foam on the water. No, no; faith is a
living and an essential thing, which makes a new creature of man, changes his
spirit and wholly and completely converts him. It goes to the foundation and
there accomplishes a renewal of the entire man; so, if I have previously seen a
sinner, I now see in his changed conduct, manner and life, that he believes. So
high and great a thing is faith.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:341]
“For this reason the Holy
Spirit urges works, that they may be witnesses of faith. In those therefore in
whom we cannot realize good works, we can immediately say and conclude: they
heard of faith, but it did not sink into good soil. For if you continue in
pride and lewdness, in greed and anger, and yet talk much of faith, St. Paul
will come and say, 1 Cor. 4:20, look here my dear Sir, "the kingdom of God
is not in word but in power." It requires life and action, and is not
brought about by mere talk.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:341-342]
“Thus we err on both sides
in saying, a person must only believe, then he will neglect to do good works
and bring forth good fruits. Again, if you preach works, the people immediately
comfort themselves and trust in works. Therefore we must walk upon the common
path. Faith alone must make us good and save us. But to know whether faith is
right and true, you must show it by your works. God cannot endure your
dissembling, for this reason he has appointed you a sermon which praises works,
which are only witnesses that you believe, and must be performed not thereby to
merit anything, but they should be done freely and gratuitously toward our
neighbor.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:342]
“For thus God has also
introduced works, as though he would say: if you believe, then you have the
kingdom of heaven; and yet, in order that you may not deceive yourselves, do
the works.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:342]
“As though [God] would say: Ye are my friends, but this the people will not
know by your faith, but when you show the fruits of faith, and break forth in
love, then they will know you. The fruits will not save you nor make you any
friends, but they must show and prove that you are saved and are my friends.
Therefore mark this well, that faith alone makes us good; but as faith lies
concealed within me, and is a great life, a great treasure, therefore the works
must come forth and bear witness of the faith, to praise God's grace and
condemn the works of men. You must cast your eyes to the earth and humiliate
yourself before everyone, that you may also win your neighbor by your services;
for this reason God lets you live, otherwise nothing would be better for you
than to die and go to heaven.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:342-343]
“For where faith is, there
is no anxiety for fine clothing and sumptuous feasting, yea, there is no
longing for riches, honor, pleasure, influence, and all that is not God
himself; but there is a seeking and a striving for and a cleaving to nothing
except to God, the highest good alone; it is the same to him whether his food
be dainty or plain, whether his clothing be fine or homespun. For although they
even do wear costly clothes, possess great influence and honor, yet they esteem
none of these things; but are forced to them, or come to them by accident, or
they are compelled to use them in the service of others.” [Sermons of
Martin Luther 2.2:19]
“…[W]e must not judge poor Lazarus in his sores, poverty and
anxiety, according to his outward appearance. For many persons suffer from
affliction and want, and yet they gain nothing by it; for example King Herod
suffered a great affliction, as is related in Acts 12:23; but afterwards he did
not have it better before God on account of it. Poverty and suffering make no
one acceptable to God; but, whoever is first acceptable to God, his poverty and
suffering are precious in the eyes of God, as Ps. 116:15 says: "Precious
in the sight of Jehovah is the death of his saints." Thus we must look into the heart of Lazarus
also, and seek the treasure which made his sores so precious. That was surely
his faith and love; for without faith it is impossible to please God, as the
author of the Epistle to the Hebrews says, 11:6. Therefore his heart also must
have confessed that he even in the midst of such poverty and misery expected
all good from God, and comfortably relied upon him; with whose blessings and
grace he was so richly satisfied, and had such pleasure in them, that he would
have heartily and willingly suffered even more misery, if the will of his
gracious God had so determined. See, that is a true, living faith, which
softened his heart by the knowledge of the divine goodness; so that nothing was
too heavy or too much to suffer and to do. So clever and skilful does faith
make the heart, when it experiences the grace of God.” [Sermons of
Martin Luther 2.2:22-23]
“All believers are like
poor Lazarus; and every believer is a true Lazarus, for he is of the same
faith, mind and will, as Lazarus. And whoever will not be a Lazarus, will
surely have his portion with the rich glutton in the flames of hell. For we all
must like Lazarus trust in God, surrender ourselves to him to work in us
according to his own good pleasure, and be ready to serve all men. And although
we all do not suffer from such sores and poverty, yet the same mind and will
must be in us, that were in Lazarus, cheerfully to bear such things, wherever
God wills it.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:25]
“…[O]nly those things are good works which God has commanded,
just as only that is a sin which god has forbidden. Therefore, he who wants to
know and do good works need only know God’s Commandments… These Commandments of
God must teach us how to distinguish among good works.” [What Luther
Says 3:1499]
Luther composed a hymn on the Ten Commandments in
which he states, “To us come these commands, that so-
Thou son of man, thy sins mayst know- And make thee also well perceive- How
before God man should live.”[LW 53:279.] Elsewhere Luther said of the
Ten Commandments, “They are the true fountain from
which all good works must flow.”[Martin Luther, as cited by Paul
Althaus, The Theology of Martin Luther
[Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1963], 272, footnote 124]
“…[N]o man can progress so far in sanctification as to keep even
one of the Ten Commandments as it should be kept, but that the Creed and the
Lord’s Prayer must come to our assistance, as we shall hear, through which we
must continually seek, pray for, and obtain the power and strength to keep the
Commandments.”[What Luther Says 3:1501]
“God has given me his law
like a mirror, in which I see what is good and evil. It says: Love the Lord thy
God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and thy
neighbor as thyself," Deut. 6:5, Mat. 22:37. Now the works of the publican
praise God and benefit the whole world, because they teach us to know, and show
us the way of God our Saviour. Therefore they are good because they praise God
and benefit our neighbor. On the other hand, the hypocrite struts forth and
blasphemes God, and with his corrupt life misleads the whole world.”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 2.2:346-347]
“While we still sojourn
here on earth, we have other teachings and ways to follow, such as the Ten
Commandments, which inform us how to keep our bodies under discipline and in
obedience, how to deal and live honorably and honestly with our neighbor while we
are together. These things are pleasing to God.”[LW 24:50]
“The benefit and fruit of
the Holy Spirit is, that sin will be changed to the highest and best use. Thus
Paul boasts to Timothy, when he was converted, that whereas he had lived such a
wicked life before, he now held his sin to be so contemptible that he composed
a hymn and sang about it thus, in 1 Tim 1, 12-17: "I thank him that
enabled me, even Christ Jesus our Lord, for that he counted me faithful,
appointing me to his service; though I was before a blasphemer, and a
persecutor, and injurious: howbeit I obtained mercy, because I did it
ignorantly in unbelief; and the grace of our Lord abounded exceedingly with
faith and love which is in Christ Jesus. Faithful is the saying, and worthy of
all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom
I am chief: howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me as chief might
Jesus Christ show forth all his longsuffering, for an example of them that
should thereafter believe on him unto eternal life. Now unto the King eternal,
immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen.”[
Sermons of Martin Luther 2:250-251]
“It is this first kind of
knowledge that some people have of God. They know very well how to say of him:
I believe in God the Father, and in his only begotten Son. But it is only upon
the tongue, like the foam on the water; it does not enter the heart.
Figuratively a big tumor still remains there in the heart; that is, they cling
somewhat to their own deeds and think they must do works in order to be
saved--that Christ's person and merit are not sufficient. Thy work is nothing,
thy wisdom is foolishness, thy counsel is nothing, thy truth also amounts to
nothing, neither does the mass avail anything before God. Then they reply: Aye,
the devil has prompted you to speak thus. They say, Christ has truly died for
us, but in a way that we, also, must accomplish something by our deeds. Notice
how deeply wickedness and unbelief are rooted in the heart. The puffed-up pride
of the heart is the reason why man can know neither Christ nor the Father.”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 2:252-253]
“Thus, faith must be
exercised, worked and polished; be purified by fire, like gold. Faith, the great
gift and treasure from God, must express itself and triumph in the certainty
that it is right before God and man, and before angels, devils and the whole
world. Just as a jewel is not to be concealed, but to be worn in sight, so
also, will and must faith be worn and exhibited, as it is written in 1 Peter 1,
7: "That the proof of your faith, being more precious than gold that
perisheth though it is proved by fire," etc.” [Sermons of Martin
Luther 2:245-246]
“Again you say: What about
the doctrine of good works? Shall this amount to nothing, or is it not a
beautiful, praiseworthy thing, when a man endeavors to keep the commandments,
and is obedient, chaste, honorable and truthful? Answer: Yes, surely; all this
is to be done; it is also a good doctrine and life, provided it is left in the
place where it belongs, and the two doctrines are kept distinct, how a man
becomes pious and righteous before God, and how and to what end he is to do
good works. For although it is necessary to teach the doctrine of good works,
at the same time, nay, even before this also must be carefully taught (so that
the doctrine of the Gospel and of faith be kept pure and unadulterated), that
all our works, however good and holy they may be, are not the treasure and
merit, by which we become acceptable to God and attain everlasting life. But it
is this alone, that Christ goes to the Father and by his departure merits this
for us, and gives and communicates to us his righteousness, innocence and
merits; and so begins in us a kingdom that we, who believe in him, are redeemed
by his power and Spirit from sin and death, and shall live with him forever. It
must not be a righteousness that continues only here upon earth and then
ceases; but a new righteousness, which endures forever in the life beyond with
God, just as Christ lives and reigns above forever.” [Sermons of Martin
Luther 2:147]
“For where the Gospel is
truly in the heart, it creates a new man who does not wait until the law comes,
but, being so full of joy in Christ, and of desire and love for that which is
good, he gladly helps and does good to every one wherever he can, from a free
heart, before he ever once thinks of the law. He wholly risks his body and
life, without asking what he must suffer on account of it, and thus abounds in
good works which flow forth of themselves. Just like Christ will not be
compelled to pick up a straw, but without compulsion he permits himself to be
nailed to the cross for me and the whole world, and dies for the lost sheep.
This may indeed be called work above work.” [Sermons of Martin Luther
2.2.76].
b. Good Works:
Serving Our Neighbor
“We now come to consider good works. We
receive Christ not only as a gift by faith, but also as an example of love
toward our neighbor, whom we are to serve as Christ serves us. Faith brings and
gives Christ to you with all his possessions. Love gives you to your neighbor
with all your possessions. These two things constitute a true and complete
Christian life; then follow suffering and persecution for such faith and love,
and out of these grows hope in patience. You ask, perhaps, what are the good
works you are to do to your neighbor? Answer: They have no name. As the good
works Christ does to you have no name, so your good works are to have no name.
Whereby do you know them? Answer: They have no name, so that there may be no
distinction made and they be not divided, that you might do some and leave
others undone. You shall give yourself up to him altogether, with all you have,
the same as Christ did not simply pray or fast for you. Prayer and fasting are
not the works he did for you, but he gave himself up wholly to you, with
praying, fasting, all works and suffering, so that there is nothing in him that
is not yours and was not done for you. Thus it is not your good work that you
give alms or that you pray, but that you offer yourself to your neighbor and
serve him, wherever he needs you and every way you can, be it with alms,
prayer, work, fasting, counsel, comfort, instruction, admonition, punishment,
apologizing, clothing, food, and lastly with suffering and dying for him. Pray,
where are now such works to be found in Christendom?” [Sermons of Martin Luther
1:34]
“If you have ears to hear and a mind to
observe, pray, listen and learn for God's sake what good works are and mean. A
good work is good for the reason that it is useful and benefits and helps the
one for whom it is done; why else should it be called good! For there is a
difference between good works and great, long, numerous, beautiful works. When
you throw a big stone a great distance it is a great work, but whom does it
benefit? If you can jump, run, fence well, it is a fine work, but whom does it
benefit? Whom does it help, if you wear a costly coat or build a fine house?”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1:35]
“Keep in mind, that you need not do any
work for God nor for the departed saints, but you ask and receive good from him
in faith. Christ has done and accomplished everything for you, atoned for your
sins, secured grace and life and salvation. Be content with this, only think
how he can become more and more your own and strengthen your faith. Hence
direct all the good you can do and your whole life to the end that it be good;
but it is good only when it is useful to other people and not to yourself. You
need it not, since Christ has done and given for you all that you might seek
and desire for yourself, here and hereafter, be it forgiveness of sins, merit
of salvation or whatever it may be called. If you find a work in you by which
you benefit God or his saints or yourself and not your neighbor, know that such
a work is not good.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1:36]
“A man is to live, speak, act, hear,
suffer and die for the good of his wife and child, the wife for the husband,
the children for the parents, the servants for their masters, the masters for
their servants, the government for its subjects, the subjects for the
government, each one for his fellow man, even for his enemies, so that one is
the other's hand, mouth, eye, foot, even heart and mind. This is a truly
Christian and good work, which can and shall be done at all times, in all
places, toward all people. You notice the Papists' works in organs,
pilgrimages, fasting, etc., are really beautiful, great, numerous, long, wide
and heavy works, but there is no good, useful and helpful work among them and
the proverb may be applied to them: It is already bad.”[
Sermons of Martin Luther 1:37]
“As we have said touching the other
Gospels, that we should learn from them the two doctrines of faith and love, or
accepting and bestowing good works, so we should do here, extol faith and
exercise love. Faith receives the good works of Christ, love bestows good works
on our neighbor.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1:109]
“Whoever does not receive salvation
through pure grace, before performing any good works, will most assuredly never
secure it; and whoever turns his good works to his own advantage and endeavors
to help himself by them and not his neighbor does no good works to begin with.” [What Luther Says 3:1504.]
“…Christ teaches us rightly
to apply the works and shows us what good works are. All other work, except
faith, we should apply to our neighbor. For God demands of us no other work
that we should do for him than to exercise faith in Christ. With that he is
satisfied, and with that we give honor to him, as to one who is merciful,
long-suffering, wise, kind, truthful and the like. After this think of nothing
else than to do to your neighbor as Christ has done to you, and let all your
works together with all your life be applied to your neighbor. Look for the
poor, sick and all kinds of needy, help them and let your life's energy here
appear, so that they may enjoy your kindness, helping whoever needs you, as
much as you possibly can with your life, property and honor. Whoever points you
to other good works than these, avoid him as a wolf and as Satan, because he
wants to put a stumbling block in your way, as David says, "In the way
wherein I walk have they hidden a snare for me," Ps. 142, 3. But this is
done by the perverted, misguided people of the Papists, who with their
religious ceremonies set aside such Christian works, and teach the people to
serve God only and not also mankind. They establish convents, masses, vigils,
become religious, do this and that. And these poor, blind people call that
serving God, which they have chosen themselves. But know that to serve God is
nothing else than to serve your neighbor and do good to him in love, be it a
child, wife, servant, enemy, friend; without making any difference, whoever
needs your help in body or soul, and wherever you can help in temporal or
spiritual matters. This is serving God and doing good works. 0, Lord God, how
do we fools live in this world, neglecting to do such works, though in all
parts of the world we find the needy, on whom we could bestow our good works;
but no one looks after them nor cares for them. But look to your own life. If
you do not find yourself among the needy and the poor, where the Gospel shows
us Christ, then you may know that your faith is not right, and that you have
not yet tasted of Christ's benevolence and work for you.” [Sermons of Martin Luther 1: 111]
“If Christ has now thus
become your own, and you have by such faith been cleansed through him and have
received your inheritance without any personal merit, but alone through the
love of God who gives to you as your own the treasure and work of his Son; it
follows that you will do good works by doing to your neighbor as Christ has
done to you. Here good works are their own teacher. What are the good works of
Christ? Is it not true that they are good because they have been done for your
benefit, for God's sake, who commanded him to do the works in your behalf? In
this then Christ was obedient to the Father, in that he loved and served us.”[Sermons
of Luther 1:145]
“Therefore since you have received enough
and become rich, you have no other commandment to serve Christ and render
obedience to him, than so to direct your works that they may be of benefit to
your neighbor, just as the works of Christ are of benefit and use to you. For
the reason Jesus said at the Last Supper: "This is my commandment that ye
love one another; even as I have loved you." John, 13: 34. Here it is seen
that he loved us and did every thing for our benefit, in order that we may do
the same, not to him, for he needs it not, but to our neighbor; this is his
commandment, and this is our obedience. Therefore it is through faith that
Christ becomes our own, and his love is the cause that we are his. He loves, we
believe, thus both are united into one. Again, our neighbor believes and
expects our love, we are therefore to love him also in return and not let him
long for it in vain. One is the same as the other; as Christ helps us so we in
return help our neighbor, and all have enough.”[Sermons of Luther 1:145]
“These are the two things in which a
Christian is to exercise himself, the one that he draws Christ into himself,
and that by faith he makes him his own, appropriates to himself the treasures
of Christ and confidently builds upon them; the other that he condescends to
his neighbor and lets him share in that which he has received, even as he
shares in the treasures of Christ. He who does not exercise himself in these
two things will receive no benefit even if he should fast unto death, suffer
torture or even give his body to be burned, and were able to do all miracles,
as St. Paul teaches, I Cor. 13ff.” [Sermons of
Luther 1:146]
“Christ is the priest, all men
are spiritual lepers because of unbelief; but when we come to faith in him he
touches us With his hand, gives and lays upon us his merit and we become clean
and whole without any merit on our part whatever. We are therefore to show our
gratitude to him and acknowledge that we have not become pious by our own
works, but through his grace, then our course will be right before God. In
addition we are to offer our gifts, that is, give of our own to help our fellow
man, to do good to him as Christ has done to us. Thus Christ is served and an
offering is brought to the rightful priest, for it is done for his sake, in
order to love and praise him.”[Sermons of Luther 1:152]
“[Christ] had the special
purpose of making mutual love a Christian obligation, and the continual
forgiveness of the neighbor the primary and foremost duty of Christians, second
only to faith and the reception of forgiveness. As we live in faith toward Him,
therefore, so also we should live in love toward our neighbor. We should not
bring annoyance or injury upon one another, but keep in mind always to forgive
one another even though we have been injured, as is inevitable in this life; we
should know that otherwise we shall not be forgiven either. Where anger and ill
will are an obstacle, this spoils the whole prayer and prevents one from being
able to pray or to wish any of the preceding petitions either. You see, this
means we must establish a firm and strong bond that will hold us together. When
we plan to come before God in prayer for what we are to obtain, we must not be
disunited or divided into schisms, factions, and sects, but we must be tolerant
toward one another in love and remain of one mind. When this is the case, the
Christian man is perfect; he believes correctly, and he loves correctly.
Whatever other faults he may have, these are to be consumed in his prayer, and
it is all forgiven and remitted.”[ LW 21:149]
“But the external signs
[of the Holy Spirit]… are these: to enjoy hearing
about Christ; to teach, give thanks, praise, and confess Him, even at the cost
of property and life; to do one’s duty according to one’s calling in a manly
way, in faith and joy; not to take delight in sin; not to invade someone else’s
calling but to serve one’s own; to help a needy brother, comfort the sorrowful,
etc. By these signs we are assured and confirmed a posteriori that we are in a
state of grace” [LW 26:378]
“A man does not live for
himself alone in tiffs mortal body to work for it alone, but he lives also for
all men on earth; rather, he lives only for others and not for himself. To this
end he brings his body into subjection that he may the more sincerely and
freely serve others, as Paul says in Rom. 14[:7–8], “None of us lives to
himself, and none of us dies to himself. If we live, we live to the Lord, and
if we die, we die to the Lord.” He cannot ever in this life be idle and without
works toward his neighbors, for he will necessarily speak, deal with, and
exchange views with men, as Christ also, being made in the likeness of men
[Phil. 2:7], was found in form as a man and conversed with men…”[LW
31:364]
“…[A] Christian lives not in himself, but in Christ and in his
neighbor. Otherwise he is not a Christian. He lives in Christ through faith, in
his neighbor through love. By faith he is caught up beyond himself into God. By
love he descends beneath himself into his neighbor. Yet he always remains in
God and in his love, as Christ says in John 1[:51], “Truly, truly, I say to
you, you will see heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending and descending
upon the Son of man.”[LW 31:370]
“For whoever feels the
goodness of God, feels also for the misfortune of his neighbor; but whoever is
not conscious of the goodness of God, sympathizes not in the misfortune of his
neighbor. Therefore as he has no pleasure in God, he has no heart for his
neighbor.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:20]
“For the nature of faith is
that it expects all good from God, and relies only on God. For from this faith
man knows God, how he is good and gracious, that by reason of such knowledge
his heart becomes so tender and merciful, that he wishes cheerfully to do to
every one, as he experiences God has done to him. Therefore he breaks forth
with love and serves his neighbor out of his whole heart, with his body and
life, with his means and honor, with his soul and spirit, and makes him
partaker of all he has, just like God did to him. Therefore he does not look
after the healthy, the high, the strong, the rich, the noble, the holy persons,
who do not need his care; but he looks after the sick, the weak, the poor, the
despised, the sinful people, to whom he can be of benefit, and among whom he
can exercise his tender heart, and do to them as God has done to him.”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 2.2:20-21]
“From [the faith of
Lazarus] follows now another virtue, namely, love to one's neighbor, so that he
is willing and ready to serve everybody; but since Lazarus is poor and in
misery himself, he had nothing with which he could serve others; therefore his
good will is taken for the deed. But
this lack of service in temporal things he abundantly makes good by his
services in things spiritual. For even now, long after his death, he serves the
whole world with his sores, hunger and misery. His bodily hunger feeds our
spiritual hunger; his bodily nakedness clothes (or feeds, as some editions
read) our spiritual nakedness; his bodily sores heal our spiritual sores; in
this way he teaches and comforts us by his example, how God is pleased with us,
when we are not prosperous here upon the earth, if we believe; and warns us how
God is angry with us, even if we are prosperous in our unbelief; just as God
had pleasure in Lazarus in his misery, and was displeased with the rich man.”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 2.2:23]
“What is the proof by which
one may know that this heavenly bread is his and that he is invited to such a
spiritual supper? He needs only to look at his own heart. If he finds it so
disposed that it is softened and cheered by God's promises and is firm in the
conviction that it may appropriate this bread of life, then he may be assured
that he is one of the invited; for as one believes, even so is it done unto
him. From that moment on, he loves his neighbor and helps him as his brother;
he rescues him, gives to him, loans to him and does nothing for him but that
which he would desire his neighbor to do for himself. All this is attributable
to the fact that Christ's kindness to him has leavened his heart with sweetness
and love, so that he has pleasure and joy in serving his neighbor; yea, he is
even in misery if he has no one to whom to show kindness. Besides all this, he
is gently and humbly disposed toward everybody; he does not highly esteem the
transient pomps of the world; he accepts everyone as he is, speaks evil of no
one, interprets all things for the best where he sees things are not going
right. When his neighbors are lacking in faith, in love, in life, then he prays
for them, and he is heartily sorry when anyone gives offense to God or to his
neighbor. To sum up all, with him the root and sap are good, for he is grafted
into a rich and fruitful vine, in Christ; therefore, such fruits must come
forth. But if one has not faith and is not taught of God--if he never eats of
this bread from heaven--he surely never brings forth these fruits. For where
such fruits are not produced, there is certainly no true faith. St. Peter
teaches us in 2 Peter 1, 10 that we should make our calling unto salvation sure
by good works; there he is really speaking of the works of love, of serving
one's neighbor and treating him as one's own flesh and blood. This is
sufficient on this Gospel. Let us pray for God's grace.”[Sermons of
Martin Luther 2:403-404]
“For if your heart is in
the state of faith that you know your God has revealed himself to you to be so
good and merciful, without thy merit, and purely gratuitously, while you were
still his enemy and a child of eternal wrath; if you believe this, you cannot
refrain from showing yourself so to your neighbor; and do all out of love to
God and for the welfare of your neighbor. Therefore, see to it that you make no
distinction between friend and foe, the worthy and the unworthy; for you see
that all who were here mentioned, have merited from us something different than
that we should love and do them good. And the Lord also teaches this, when in
Luke 6:35 he says: "But love your enemies, and do good unto them, and
lend, never despairing; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be sons of
the Most High: for he is kind toward the unthankful and evil." Thus we
have considered the first part of this Gospel.” [Sermons of Martin
Luther 2.2:101]
“…[I]f anyone does anything which God’s Word has not prescribed,
his work has no standing before God and is lost labor….The Psalter, too, and
all the prophets complain that the people are doing ‘good works’ which they
themselves have chosen and God has not commanded. For God can and will not
allow those who are His to undertake to do anything that He has not commanded,
even though it be ever so good. For the obedience which clings to God’s Word is
of all works the noblest and the best.”[What Luther Says 3:1500]
“And to come to our
Papists' work, what does it avail if they put silver or gold on the walls, wood
and stone in the churches? Who would be made better, if each village had ten
bells, as big as those at Erfurt? Whom would it help if all the houses were
convents and monasteries as splendid as the temple of Solomon? Who is benefited
if you fast for St. Catherine, St. Martin or any other saint? Whom does it
benefit, if you are shaved half or wholly, if you wear a gray or a black cap?
Of what use were it if all people field mass every hour? What benefit is it if
in one church, as at Meissen, they sing day and night Without interruption? Who
is better for it, if every church had more silver, pictures and jewelry than
the churches of Halle and Wittenberg? It is folly and deception, men's lies
invented these things and called them good works; they all pretend they serve
God thus and pray for the people and their sins, just as if they helped God
with their property or as if his saints were in need of our work. Sticks and
stones are not as rude and mad as we are. A tree bears fruit, not for itself,
but for the good of man and beast, and these fruits are its good works.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1:35]
“Hear then how Christ explains good works,
Math. 7, 12: "Whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, even so do
ye unto them; for this is the law and the prophets." Do you hear now what
are the contents of the whole law and of all the prophets? You are not to do
good to God and to his dead saints, they are not in need of it; still less to
wood and stone, to which it is of no use, nor is it needed, but to men, to men,
to men. Do you not hear? To men you should do everything that you would they
should do to you. I would not have you build me a church or tower or cast bells
for me. I would not have you construct for me an organ with fourteen stops and
ten rows of flute work. Of this I can neither eat nor drink, support neither
wife nor child, keep neither house nor land. You may feast my eyes on these and
tickle my ears, but what shall I give to my children? Where are the necessaries
of life? 0 madness, madness! The bishops and lords, who should check it, are
the first in such folly, and one blind leader leads the other. Such people
remind me of young girls playing with dolls and of boys riding on sticks.
Indeed, they are nothing but children and players with dolls, and riders of
hobbyhorses.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1: 36]
“You notice the Papists'
works in organs, pilgrimages, fasting, etc., are really beautiful, great,
numerous, long, wide and heavy works, but there is no good, useful and helpful
work among them and the proverb may be applied to them: It is already bad. But
beware of their acute subtleties, when they say: If these works are not good to
our neighbor in his body, they do spiritual good to his soul, since they serve
God and propitiate him and secure his grace. Here it is time to say: You lie as
wide as your mouth. God is to be worshiped not with works, but by faith, faith
must do everything that is to be done between God and us. There may be more
faith in a millerboy than in all the Papists, and it may gain more than all
priests and monks do with their organs and jugglery, even if they had more
organs than these now have pipes. He who has faith can pray for his fellow man,
he who has no faith can pray for nothing. It is a satanic lie to call such
outward pomp spiritually good and useful works. A miller's maid, if she
believes, does more good, accomplishes more, and I would trust her more, if she
takes the sack from the horse, than all the priests and monks, if they kill
themselves singing day and night and torment themselves to the quick. You
great, coarse fools, would you expect to help the people with your faithless
life and distribute spiritual goods, when there is on earth no more miserable,
needy, godless people than you are? You should be called, not spiritual, but
spiritless.”[Sermons of Martin Luther
1:37]
“But the Papists and their disciples, who
would get rid of death, sin and hell by their own works and satisfaction, must
remain in them eternally for they undertake to do for themselves what Christ
alone did and could do, of whom they should expect it by faith. Therefore they
are foolish, deluded people who do works for Christ and his saints, which they
should do for their neighbor. Again, what they should expect of Christ by faith
they would find in themselves and have gone so far as to spend on stone and
wood, on bells and incense what they should spend on their neighbors. They go
on and do good to God and his saints, fast for them and dedicate to them
prayers, and at the same time leave their neighbor as he is, thinking only, let
us first help ourselves! Then comes the pope and sells them his letter of
indulgence and leads them into heaven, not into God's heaven, but into the
pope's heaven, which is the abyss of hell. Behold, this is the fruit of
unbelief and ignorance of Christ, this is our reward for having left the Gospel
in obscurity and setting up human doctrine in its place. I repeat it, I wish
all pulpits in the world lay in ashes, and the monasteries, convents, churches,
hermitages and chapels, and everything were ashes and powder, because of this
shameful misleading of souls.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1:39]
“Thus you perceive how skillfully the rude
Papists made this passage [Matt. 23:2-3] the foundation of their doctrine, lies
and tyranny, though no other passage is more strongly against them and more
severely condemns their teachings than this one. Christ's words stand firm and
are clear; do not follow their works. But their doctrine is their own work, and
not God's. They are a people exalted only to lie and to pervert the Scriptures.
Moreover, if one's life is bad, it would be strange indeed if he should preach
right; he would always have to preach against himself, which he will hardly do
without additions and foreign doctrines. In short, he who does not preach the
Gospel, identifies himself as one who is sitting neither on Moses' nor on
Christ's seat. For this reason you should do neither according to his words nor
according to his works, but flee from him as Christ's sheep do, John 10, 4-5:
"And the sheep follow him, for they know his voice. And a stranger will
they not follow, but flee from him." But if you wish to know what their
seat is called, then listen to David: "Blessed is the man that walketh not
in the counsel of the wicked, nor standeth in the way of the sinner, nor
sitteth in the seat of scoffers, Ps. 1,1. Again: "Shall the throne of
wickedness have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by statute?"
Ps. 94, 20.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1:95]
“Paul says (Col.3:24): ‘Ye serve the Lord
Christ.’ Ah, if priests, monks, and nuns were in such a state, how would they
thank God and rejoice! For not one of them can say: God has commanded me to celebrate
Mass, to sing matins, to observe the seven daily hours of prayer, and the like;
for Scripture does not contain one word on the subject. Therefore if they are
asked whether they are confident and assured that their state pleases God, they
say no. But if you ask an insignificant maid-servant why she scours a dish or
milks the cow, she can say: I know that the thing I do pleases God, for I have
God’s Word and commandment…God does not look at the insignificance of the acts
but at the heart that serves Him in such little things.”[What Luther Says 3:1501]
“Christ predicted that men would come who
would do signs and wonders in order to lead even the elect into error, if that
were possible. Therefore we must not rely on any works or miracles unless they
are produced by faith and further faith.”[ What Luther Says 3:1502]
“Observe now from this how far those have
gone out of the way who have united good works with stone, wood, clothing,
eating and drinking. Of what benefit is it to your neighbor if you build a
church entirely out of gold!? Of what benefit to him is the frequent ringing of
great church bells? Of what benefit to him is the glitter and the ceremonies in
the churches, the priests' gowns, the sanctuary, the silver pictures and
vessels? Of what benefit to him are the many candles and much incense? Of what
benefit to him is the much chanting and mumbling, the singing of vigils and
masses? Do you think that God will permit himself to be paid with the sound of
bells, the smoke of candles, the glitter of gold and such fancies? He has
commanded none of these, but if you see your neighbor going astray, sinning, or
suffering in body or soul, you are to leave every thing else and at once help
him in every way in your power and if you can do no more, help him with words
of comfort and prayer. Thus has Christ done to you and given you an example for
you to follow.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1:147]
“Now let every one examine himself in the
light of the Gospel and see how far he is from Christ, what is the character of
his faith and love. There are many who are enkindled with dreamy devotion, when
they hear of such poverty of Christ, are almost angry with the citizens of
Bethlehem, denounce their blindness and ingratitude, and think, if they had
been there, they would have shown the Lord and his mother a more becoming
service, and would not have permitted them to be treated so miserably. But they
do not look by their side to see how many of their fellow men need their help,
and which they let go on in their misery unaided. Who is there upon earth that
has no poor, miserable, sick, erring ones, or sinful people around him? Why
does he not exercise his love to those? Why does he not do to them as Christ
has done to him?”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 1:155]
“It is altogether false to
think that you have done much for Christ, if you do nothing for those needy
ones. Had you been at Bethlehem you would have paid as little attention to
Christ as they did; but since is is now made known who Christ is, you profess
to serve him. Should he come now and lay himself in a manger, and would send
you word that it was he, of whom you now know so much, you might do something
for him, but you would not have done it before. Had it been positively made
known to the rich man in the Gospel, to what high position Lazarus would be
exalted, and he would have been convinced of the fact, he would not have left
him lie and perish as he did. Therefore, if your neighbor were now what he
shall be in the future, and lay before you, you would surely give him
attention. But now, since it is not so, you beat the air and do not recognize
the Lord in your neighbor, you do not do to him as he has done to you.
Therefore God permits you to be blinded, and deceived by the pope and false
preachers, so that you squander on wood, stone, paper, and wax that with which
you might help your fellow man.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 1:155]
“…[N]o blood, nor relationship, nor command, nor doctrine, nor
reason, nor free will, nor good works, nor exemplary living, nor Carthusian
orders, nor any religious orders, though they were angelic, are of any use or
help to this sonship of God; but they are only a hindrance. For where reason is
not first renewed and in agreement with the new birth, it takes offence,
becomes hardened and blinded, so that it will scarcely, if ever, be able to be
righted; but thinks its doings and ways are right and proper, storming and
raving against all who disregard and reject its doings. Therefore the old man
remains the enemy of God and of grace, of Christ and of his light, beheads John
and destroys his testimony, the Gospel, and sets up his own human doctrines.
Thus the game goes on even now, in full splendour and power, in the doings of
the pope and his clergy, who together know nothing of this divine birth. They
prattle and speak nonsense in their doctrines and commandments of certain good
works, with which they hope to attain grace, though still clad in the old Adam.
But what is here said remains unchangeable: Not of blood, not of the will of
the flesh nor of man, but of God, is this new birth. We must despair of our own
will, works, and life, which have been poisoned by the false, stubborn, selfish
light of reason; in all things listen to the voice and testimony of the
Baptist; believe and obey it. Then the true Light, Christ will enlighten us,
renew us, and give us power to become the sons of God. For this reason he came
and was made man…”[Sermons of Martin Luther
1:214-215]
“…[T]he Papists themselves have devised good works
and divine worship with their outward deeds and laws, all of which, however,
are faithless things, founded only upon works and without God’s command, mere
human prattle. So we say, they do not serve God, but themselves and Satan, as
is the case with all idolatry; and they only mislead the people from their
Christian faith and common brother love; but they will not suffer us to say
that, and thus begins the misery that reigns now. Both agree that they are to
serve God and do good works; but as to the definition, what is the service of God
and good works, they will never agree. For these say, faith is nothing, nature
with her works is good and right. Moreover, they also agreed that the open
coarse sins, as murder, adultery, and robbery are not right; but in the
principal works that pertain to divine worship, there they separate as far from
one another as winter is from summer. The first hold to God and his mercy, and
fear him; the others run to wood and stones, food and clothing, days and
seasons and wish to win the favor of God by building, by bequests, by fastings,
by their blaring voices and by their shaven heads. They fear nothing, are
impudent and full of every kind of presumption. Oh! what a holy, wise, learned
people, for whom God himself is neither sufficiently holy, wise nor learned,
with all his prophets, wise men and scribes.”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 1:227-228]
“Any work that is
not done solely for the purpose of keeping the body under control or of serving
one’s neighbor, as long as he asks nothing contrary to God, is not good or
Christian. For this reason I greatly fear that few or no colleges, monasteries,
altars, and offices of the church are really Christian in our day—nor the
special fasts and prayers on certain saints’ days. I fear, I say, that in all
these we seek only our profit, thinking that through them our sins are purged
away and that we find salvation in them. In this way Christian liberty perishes
altogether. This is a consequence of our ignorance of Christian faith and
liberty.”[LW
31:370]
“Let us now consider the
fool, the Pharisee. Here are most beautiful works. In the first place he thanks
God, fasts twice in the week, and all this to honor God, not St. Nicholas or
St. Barnabas, he gives the tenth of all his goods, nor has he at any time committed
adultery, has never done any one violence or robbed him of his goods. Thus he
has conducted himself in an exemplary manner. This is a beautiful honest life,
and excites our wonder and surprise. Truly, after the fashion of the world no
one could find fault with him, yea, one must praise him. Yes, to be sure he
does this himself. But God is the first
to come and say, that all the work of the Pharisee is blasphemy. God help us,
what an awful sentence this is! Priests and nuns may well be terrified by it,
and all their bones quake, as you scarcely ever find one of them as pious as
this Pharisee. Would to God we could have many such hypocrites and Pharisees;
for then they could be taught better things. Well, what is the matter with the
good man? Only this, he does not know his own heart. Here you see that we are
our own greatest enemies, who close our eyes and hearts, and think we are as we
feel.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:343-344]
“Now [the Pharisee] comes and praises himself that he is just. He has a
poisonous, wicked heart, who praises himself most gloriously on account of his
pretended good works, how he fasted and gave the tenth of all he had. Hence he
is so full of hatred to his neighbor, if God allowed him to judge, he would
plunge the poor publican down into the deepest hell. Behold, is not this a
wicked heart and terrible to hear, that I would all men should go to ruin, if
only I be praised? Yet all this is so finely decorated and adorned by external
conduct, that no one can censure it. Here we see how we are to know the tree
from its fruits. For when I view his heart with spiritual eyes, I recognize it
is full of blasphemy and hatred to his neighbor. From these fruits I know that
the tree is evil. For works would not be evil in themselves, but the evil root
in the heart makes them evil. This is set before us that we may beware and
guard ourselves against it.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:346]
“But the nature of unbelief
is that it does not expect any good from God. By which unbelief the heart is
blinded so that it neither feels nor knows how good and gracious God is; but as
Psalm 14:2 says: he cares not for God, seeks not after him. Out of this
blindness follows further that his heart becomes so hard, obdurate and
unmerciful that he has no desire to do a kindness to his fellow man; yea, he
would rather harm and offend everybody. For as he is insensible to the goodness
of God, so he takes no pleasure in doing good to his neighbor. Consequently it
follows that he does not look after the sick, poor and despised people, to whom
he could and should be helpful and profitable; but he casts his eyes upward and
sees only the high, rich and influential, from whom be himself may receive
advantage, gain, pleasure and honor.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:21]
“So we see now in the
example of the rich man [Luke 16:19-31] that it is impossible to love, where no
faith exists, and impossible to believe, where there is no love; for both will
and must be together, so that a believer loves everybody and serves everybody;
but an unbeliever at heart is an enemy of everybody and wishes to be served by
every person and yet he covers all such horrible, perverted sins with the
little show of his hypocritical works as with a sheep's skin; just as that
large bird, the ostrich, which is so stupid that when it sticks its head into a
bush, it thinks its entire body is concealed. Yea, here you see that there is
nothing blinder and more unmerciful than unbelief. For here the dogs, the most
irascible animals, are more merciful to poor Lazarus than this rich man, and
they recognize the need of the poor man and lick his sores; while the obdurate,
blinded hypocrite is so hard hearted that he does not wish him to have the
crumbs that fell from his table. Now all unbelieving people are like this rich
hypocrite. Unbelief cannot do nor be different than this rich man is pictured
and set forth by his life. And especially is this the character of the clergy,
as we see before our eyes, who never do a truly good work, but only seek a good
time, never serving nor profiting any one; but reversing the order they want
everybody to serve them. Like harpies they only claw everything into their own
pockets; and like the old adage runs they "rob the poor of his
purse." They are not moved in the least by the poverty of others. And
although some have not expensive food and raiment, yet they do not lack will
power and the spirit of action; for they imitate the rich, the princes and the
lords, and do many hypocritically good works by founding institutions and building
churches, with which they conceal the great rogue, the wolf of unbelief; so
that they become obdurate and hardened and are of no use to anybody. These are
the rich man.”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:21-22]
“There are continually
before our eyes poor and needy persons, whom God lays before us as the greatest
treasures; but we close our eyes to them, and see not what God does there;
later, when God has done his work, and we have neglected the treasure, then we
hasten and wish to serve, but we waited too long. Then we begin and make sacred
relics of their garments, shoes and furniture, and make pilgrimages to and
erect churches over their graves, are occupied with many like foolish deeds and
thus ridicule ourselves in that we permit the living saints to be trodden under
our feet and to perish, and we worship their garments, which is neither
necessary nor of any use; so that indeed our Lord will let the judgment fall as
he did in Mat. 23:29-33, and say: ‘Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and garnish the tombs
of the righteous, and say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we should
not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye
witness to yourselves, that ye are sons of them that slew the prophets. Fill ye
up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how
shall ye escape the judgment of hell?’ ”[Sermons of Martin Luther
2.2:24-25]
“But that we should
institute masses, vigils and prayers to be repeated forever for the dead every
year, as if God had not heard us the year before, is the work of Satan and is
death itself, where God is mocked by unbelief, and such prayers are nothing but
blasphemy of God. Therefore take warning and turn from these practices. God is
not moved by these anniversary ceremonies, but by the prayer of the heart, of
devotion and of faith; that will help the departed souls if anything will.
Vigils, masses, indeed help the bellies of the priests, monks and nuns, but
departed souls are not helped by them and God is thus mocked.”[Sermons
of Martin Luther 2.2:30.]
“…[T]hose who parade their own works, do not know Christ. Neither
do they know what the Father has done through Christ. Nor do they know that God
is not interested in their good works, but in his Son alone. Thus, they do not
know the Father, neither do they know what they have received from the Father,
through Christ. Therefore, they must fall and perish, and behold God in his
severest aspect--as a judge. They try to silence the judgment with their good
works, but they find no good work that is sufficient to do this, and then they
must finally despair. When people see that they, themselves, are nothing, and
establish the foundation of their hearts upon Christ, esteem him as the highest
good, and know God as a Father in death and life--this is to ‘know God.’
”[ Sermons of Martin Luther 2: 253-254]
“…[I]f anybody comes and tries to make a fool of you, makes much ado and tells you wonders about great exceptional holiness, and directs you to live after the example of this or that great saint, in order thereby to please God and become a Christian, you can say to him: Dear sir, I grant all that is good and I also would like to be pious, do according to God's commandments, and keep myself from sin; but you shall never persuade me, that in this way I become a Christian or attain to greater and higher things. They also, who fasted, labored and suffered so much, did not become Christians by that. For this were to encroach upon my dear Lord Christ, so that he would have gone away in vain and human work would be placed on equality with his. But I wish to be called a Christian, as he taught me and all saints have had to do, if they wished to stand before God, because I cling to this Saviour and, as St. Paul says in Phil 3, 9: "Be found in him, not having a righteousness of mine own, even that which is of the law," but his, which he gained for me by this departure, by which he overcame my sin and death, and which he announces and grants to me through the preaching of the Gospel. When you once have this, then go and do as many good works as you can; however, do it according to the commandment of God, for without this and before him you will be able to do nothing good, because you are still in unbelief, and have and know not Christ, and therefore are under sin with all that you do…”[Sermons of Martin Luther 2:150-151]
“For, although a man has
exercised himself in [works] during his whole life much and long, and has done
everything that he was able to do; nevertheless he cannot thereby attain to
certainty that God is pleased with it and is truly gracious to him. Hence in
every such life the heart always remains uncertain and in doubt. All
experienced consciences give evidence of this, and even the monks bear
testimony to it in their books, in which they teach openly, that one must
doubt, for no man can know whether he is in a state of grace, and it would be
presumptuous in a high degree to make this boast with reference to one's self.”
[Sermons of Martin Luther 2:148-149]
“…[I]t is manifest what a
shameful, cursed doctrine the monks and the whole papacy have hitherto taught,
whereby they have misled the world. They not only taught no word of Christ and
faith, but they even claimed with impudence, that their monkery is a much
higher, nobler and more perfect life than that of ordinary Christians, which
ought to be an abomination to all Christians to hear. For one may exalt and
extol the life and piety of all men, the chastity of virgins, the discipline
and asceticism of hermits, the laudable deeds and virtues of great, excellent
and pious lords and rulers, and whatever may be described to pious people, as
high as one pleases; it never can equal a Christian, that is, one who has this
Lord, sitting at the right hand of God, and his righteousness. We will gladly
let that also stand for what it is worth and praise it as a precious gift; but
a Christian is to be extolled as a lord far and high above all that, as one
that has this eternal possession and inheritance in the kingdom of heaven at
the right hand of God with Christ, his brother.” [Sermons of Martin
Luther 2:149-150]
These endnotes provide the necessary bibliographic information utilized. Please note: “LW” refers to Luther’s Works, English edition (55 volumes). Secondly, the endnotes serve as an area to further substantiate a point. When possible, web links are included for the authors or topics discussed. If any of the links do not work, I suggest copying the “http” address to this Internet archive site: http://www.archive.org/.
[2] Peter Brunner and Bernard J. Holm, Luther in the 20th Century, (Iowa: Luther College Press, 1961), 86. Denifle was corrected for his mistaken vilifying polemic against Luther by the Roman Catholic Scholar F.X. Kiefl. Kiefl is credited as the first Catholic scholar to put forth a new, kinder approach to Luther. Kiefl was a German theologian at the University of Wurzburg. His groundbreaking article on Luther was “Martin Luther’s Religious Psyche as the Root of a New Philosophical World View” which first appeared in the monthly journal, Monatschrift fur alle Gebiete des Wissens. Kiefl rejected Denifle’s popular notion that Luther simply invented his doctrine of justification by faith alone to excuse sinful behavior. Denifle had spent considerable time painting Luther as a gross sinner. Kiefl rejects this. He sees past Denifle’s rhetoric and distorted facts and sees that Luther never denied good works or holy living. Rather good works are the way in which faith expresses itself. Richard Stauffer explains Kiefl:“…Denifle was at fault in seeing in Luther’s protest a libertine revolt against the Church and in regarding his theology as an excuse to condone his behavior” [Richard Stauffer, Luther As Seen By Catholics, (Virginia: John Knox Press, 1967), 37]. James Atkinson comments, “Kiefl contradicted Denifle, maintaining that Luther’s doctrine of justification implied works as a fruit of justification, and that Luther was no libertine seeking excuses for low morality. He made the important point that Luther never sought to replace dogma by religious feeling” [Martin Luther: Prophet to the Church Catholic (Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1983), 21].
[3] Peter Guilday, As cited in Patrick O’Hare, The Facts About Luther (Illinois: Tan Books, 1987), xiv, 374.
[6] Sermons of Martin Luther 1:110.
[7] Roland Bainton, Here I Stand (New York: Mentor Books), 259.
[9] In The Disputation
Concerning Justification, Luther answered this spurious proposition: “Faith
without works justifies, Faith without works is dead [Jas. 2:17, 26].
Therefore, dead faith justifies.” Luther responded: “The
argument is sophistical and the refutation is resolved grammatically. In the
major premise, “faith” ought to be placed with the word “justifies” and the
portion of the sentence “without works justifies” is placed in a predicate
periphrase and must refer to the word “justifies,” not to “faith.” In the minor
premise, “without works” is truly in the subject periphrase and refers to
faith. We say that justification is effective without works, not that faith is
without works. For that faith which lacks fruit is not an efficacious but a
feigned faith. “Without works” is ambiguous, then. For that reason this
argument settles nothing. It is one thing that faith justifies without works;
it is another thing that faith exists without works” [LW 34:175-176].
[15] Sermons of Martin Luther
1:34. Says Paul Althaus of Luther’s position, “…[R]ighteousness and certainty
of salvation, once experienced, lead, with inner necessity, to ‘woks,’ to new
obedience, and to joyfully serving God by serving the neighbor” [Paul Althaus, The
Theology of Martin Luther
[Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1963], 246.
[17] LW 48: 277.
[18] “Luther had required that at the Lord’s Supper the cup, in accordance with the original institution of Christ, should be given to the laity. Carlstadt and Zwilling, however, wished to make it a sin for a person to partake of the Communion without the cup being given to the communicants” [Julius Kostlin, Life of Luther (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1911), 256].
[19] LW 48:279. “”The project of restoring at Wittenberg the celebration of the Lord’s Supper, as originally instituted, with the cup, met with Luther’s full approval; for the tyranny which the Christian congregations had hitherto endured in this respect had been acknowledged there, and there was a general wish to resist it” [Julius Kostlin, Life of Luther (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1911), 257].
[20] LW 48:280.
[21] LW 48:281.
[22] LW 48:281.
[23] LW 48:281. An alternate translation is offered by Project Wittenberg: “If you are a preacher of mercy, do not preach an imaginary but the true mercy. If the mercy is true, you must therefore bear the true, not an imaginary sin. God does not save those who are only imaginary sinners. Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides. We, however, says Peter (2. Peter 3:13) are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth where justice will reign. It suffices that through God's glory we have recognized the Lamb who takes away the sin of the world. No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day. Do you think such an exalted Lamb paid merely a small price with a meager sacrifice for our sins? Pray hard for you are quite a sinner.”
W.H.T. Dau also presents another English translation, “If you are a preacher of grace, do not preach a fictitious, but the true grace. If grace is of the true sort, you will also have to bear true, not fictitious sins. God does not save those who only acknowledge themselves sinners in a feigned manner. Be a sinner, then, and sin bravely, but believe more bravely still and rejoice in Christ, who is Victor over sin, death, and the world. We must sin as long as we are in this world; the present life is not an abode of righteousness; however, we look for new heavens and a new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness, says Peter…We are satisfied, by the richness of God’s glory, to have come to the knowledge of the Lamb that taketh away the sins of the world. No sin shall wrest us from Him, were we even in one day to commit fornication and manslaughter a thousand times. Do you think the price paltry and the payment small that has been made for us by this great Lamb?” [W.H.T. Dau, Luther Examined and Reexamined: A Review of Catholic Criticism and a Plea for Reevaluation (St Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1917), 125-126].
[24] Some authors present what I
call the “Melanchthon defense.” It is argued that Melanchthon has been overly
concerned about minor sins in his life: he is blowing them way out of
proportion, to the annoyance of Luther. David Scaer uses such an explanation;
“[Luther] was annoyed with Melanchthon’s obsession with minor sins and urged
him to do something really sinful: “sin boldly” [David Scaer, “The Law and
the Gospel in Lutheran Theology,” Grace Theological Journal Vol. 12:2 Fall
91, 178]. Scaer infers that such a suggestion from Luther was part of his
“crude peasant speech, which today would be looked upon by some as signs of an
unsanctified life” [ibid.]. Such a trivial explanation is at odds with the overwhelming
exhortations to sanctification Luther gave repeatedly, especially during his
preaching. W.H.T. Dau presents a toned down version: “[Luther] fears his
young colleague is becoming a prey to morbid self-incrimination. It is again a
case of ‘Puppensuenden’ being expanded till they seem ethical monstrosities”
[W.H.T. Dau, Luther Examined and Reexamined: A Review of Catholic Criticism
and a Plea for Reevaluation (St Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1917),
127]. Dau’s suggestion is more plausible than Scaer’s, but there is nothing in
the immediate context to suggest this psychological/spiritual state of
Melanchthon motivated Luther to pen the words “sin boldly.” Dau goes on to
interpret Luther’s words primarily as an exhortation to Melanchthon to be bold
in his preaching of the gospel: “Melanchthon was a public preacher and
expounder of the doctrine of evangelical grace. He must not preach that
doctrine mincingly, haltingly….There are some sinners in this world that will
not understand your faint evangelical whispers; they need to have the truth
that Christ forgives their sins,- all their sins,- their worst sins, blown into
them with all he trumpets that made the walls of Jericho fall. If Melanchthon
did not require a strong faith in the forgiving grace of God for himself, he
needed it as a teacher of that grace to others; he must, therefore, familiarize
himself with the immensity and power of that grace”[ibid.].
[25] What Luther says, 2:603.
[26] What Luther Says, 3:1304.
[27] What Luther Says 3:1303.
[28] What Luther Says 3:1303.
[29] What Luther Says, 3:1303.
[30] What Luther Says 3:1315.
[31] Sermons of Martin Luther 2:250.
[32] What Luther Says, 3:1319.
[33] Jared Wicks, Luther and His Spiritual Legacy, (Delaware: Michael Glazier, Inc., 1983), 29.
[34] W.H.T. Dau, Luther Examined and Reexamined: A Review of Catholic Criticism and a Plea for Reevaluation (St Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1917), 126.
[35] LW 34:161.
[36] Sermons of Martin Luther 2.2:344-345.
[37]
Catholic Scholars Dialogue with
Luther (Jared Wicks, S.J,
Editor. 1970, Loyola University Press), 12.
[38] Catholic
Scholars Dialogue with Luther (Jared Wicks, S.J, Editor. 1970, Loyola University Press), 5-6.
[39] Robert Preus, “The Theology of the Cross Part One: Luther and Lutheranism” (Reformation and Revival, Vol. 7:1 Winter, 1998), 7.4.72].
[40] Catholic Answers: Leslie Rumble, The Disaster of
"By Faith Alone" (This
Rock vol. 14, no. 2, Feb. 2003).
[41] Patrick O’Hare, The Facts About Luther, xii-xiii, introductory comments by Rev. Peter Guilday PH.D, Catholic University of America.
[42] Patrick O’Hare, The Facts About Luther (Illinois: Tan Books, 1987), 120.
[46]
Hartmann Grisar, Luther vol. III (St Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1919), 196.
[47]Hartmann
Grisar, Luther vol. III (St Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1919), 196. Elsewhere Grisar confirms the statement
should not be taken literally: “This paradoxical aphorism was not, as has
frequently been assumed, a command to commit sin, against which Luther always
wrote and preached, but a very offensive hyperbolical expression of the
certitude, inculcated by him, that faith in a merciful God suffices to obtain
pardon for all sins, provided that faith in God is ‘boldly’ asserted” [Hartmann
Grisar, Martin Luther: His Life and Work (Maryland: The Newman Press,
1950), 206]. That Grisar finds the statement “offensive” is a matter of his own
opinion.
[48]
Hartmann Grisar, Luther vol. III (St Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1919), 197-198.
[49] Hartmann Grisar, Luther vol. III (St Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1919), 196-197.
[50]
Hartmann Grisar, Luther vol. III (St Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1919),
196. Grisar says elsewhere, “It seems
Melanchthon, who was spiritually weaker than Luther, was afflicted by the fear
of sin” [Hartmann Grisar, Martin Luther: His Life and Work (Maryland:
The Newman Press, 1950), 206]. Grisar doesn’t confirm how he knew this about
Melanchthon. The context of the letter itself from August 1, 1521 in no way
suggests this. That the letter is only a fragment should give Grisar and others
reason for caution.
[51] Hartmann Grisar, Luther vol. III (St Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1919), 197. Grisar says elsewhere, “In the context the phrase ‘sin boldly’ conveys a sinister impression, involving as it does, fundamentally, a strong self-condemnation of the Lutheran theory of fiduciary faith and justification” [Hartmann Grisar, Martin Luther: His Life and Work (Maryland: The Newman Press, 1950), 206].
[53] Hartmann Grisar, Martin Luther: His Life and Work (Maryland: The Newman Press, 1950), 206. Grisar here approvingly quotes Mohler,
[56] Patrick W. Carey, “Luther in an American Catholic Context,” found in: Timothy Maschke, Franz Posset, and Joan Skocir (eds.), Ad Fontes Lutheri: Toward the Recovery of the Real Luther: Essays in Honor of Kenneth Hagen’s Sixty-Fifth Birthday, (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2001), 45.
[57] Catholic Encyclopedia, Justification entry
[59] Henry O’Connor, S.J., Luther’s Own Statements concerning His Teaching and its Results (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1884), 3.
[60] Henry O’Connor, S.J., Luther’s Own Statements concerning His Teaching and its Results (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1884), 5.
[61] Henry O’Connor, S.J., Luther’s Own Statements concerning His Teaching and its Results (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1884), iii.
[62] Henry O’Connor, S.J., Luther’s Own Statements concerning His Teaching and its Results (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1884), iv.
[63] Henry O’Connor, S.J., Luther’s Own Statements concerning His Teaching and its Results (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1884), 18.
[64] Henry O’Connor, S.J., Luther’s Own Statements concerning His Teaching and its Results (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1884), 61-62.
[65] Catholic Culture, The Most Theological Collection: The Augsburg Confession
[66] Greg Oatis, The Myth of Martin Luther, and Why So Few Read His Works.
[67] Catholic Answers, Purgatory by Rev. William G. Most (This Rock Vol. 3, No. 4, April 1992).
[68] Catholic Answers, Walking the Ecumenical Tightrope by Phillip Blosser (This Rock Vol. 9, No. 10, Oct. 1998).
[69] EWTN, Galatians. Obey, by Fr. William Most.
[70] EWTN, "SAVED" IN SCRIPTURE, by Fr. William Most.
[71] EWTN, JUSTIFICATION: DOCTRINE OF COUNCIL OF TRENT, by Fr. William Most.
[73] EWTN, LUTHER WRITES OBITUARY OF HIS OWN CHURCH by Fr. William Most.
[74] EWTN, DEAD SEA SCROLLS: THREAT TO CHRISTIANITY?, by Fr. William Most.
[75] Coming Home Network, The Visible Church Was There All Along by Cindy Beck.
[78] Dave Armstrong, Martin Luther: Beyond Mythology to Historical Fact. In fairness to Armstrong, this quote is from one of his older papers. It is quite possible he no longer holds to this faulty statement and interpretation.
[79] Paul Althaus, The Theology of Martin Luther (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1966), 246
[80] Rev. John H.C. Fritz, “Luther as a Preacher,” found in W.H.T. Dau (editor), Four Hundred Years: Commemorative Essays on the Reformation of Dr. Martin Luther and its Blessed Results [St Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1917), 204.